This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lao-Sirieix, P. Articles by Fitzgerald, R. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lao-Sirieix, P. Articles by Fitzgerald, R. C.

Cyclin A Immunocytology as a Risk Stratification Tool for Barrett's Esophagus Surveillance

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Medical Research Council-Cancer Cell Unit, Medical Research Council/Hutchison Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom and ² National Medical Laser Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Rebecca Fitzgerald, Medical Research Council/Hutchison Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom CB2 2XZ. Phone: 44-1223-763287; Fax: 44-1223-763296; E-mail: rcf{at}hutchison-mrc.cam.ac.uk.

Purpose: Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) by histopathologic biopsy assessment is suboptimal. A proliferation marker, minichromosome maintenance protein 2, has potential as a biomarker but lacks specificity. We hypothesized that cyclin A, which detects a proportion of proliferating cells, would be more specific. Because cytologic sampling has clinical advantages, we also evaluated the efficacy of cyclin A in endoscopic brushing samples.

Experimental Design: A cross-sectional cyclin A immunostaining study was done in 77 patients attending for BE surveillance and 17 patients undergoing evaluation of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The control tissues were as follows: 30 squamous esophagus, 20 gastric antrum, and 13 duodenum. A nested case-control study was done within the same surveillance cohort (16 progressors compared with 32 matched controls) to determine the relative risk for progression. Immunocytology was done for endoscopic brushings collected prospectively from 75 BE ± dysplasia and 33 esophageal adenocarcinomas.

Results: Surface expression of cyclin A in BE samples correlated with the degree of dysplasia (P = 0.016). In the case-control cohort, patients with biopsies expressing cyclin A at the surface were more likely to progress to adenocarcinoma than those who did not (odds ratio, 7.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-30.7). The sensitivity and specificity of cyclin A expression in brushings for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and cancer patients were 97.8% and 58.7%, respectively. The associated negative predictive value was 97.4%.

Conclusions: Cyclin A immunopositivity correlates with cancer risk. Application of this marker to endoscopic brushings could be used as a first step to identify BE patients with the highest risk of progression.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. di Pietro, C. J. Peters, and R. C. Fitzgerald Clinical puzzle: Barrett's oesophagus Dis. Model. Mech., July 1, 2008; 1(1): 26 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]