This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Troiani, T. Articles by Eckhardt, S. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Troiani, T. Articles by Eckhardt, S. G.

Investigation of Two Dosing Schedules of Vandetanib (ZD6474), an Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling, in Combination with Irinotecan in a Human Colon Cancer Xenograft Model

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado; Departments of ² Anesthesiology and ³ Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado; and ⁴ Dipartimento Medico-Chirurgico di Internistica Clinica e Sperimentale "F Magrassi e A Lanzara," Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Napoli, Italy

Requests for reprints: S. Gail Eckhardt, University of Colorado Cancer Center, 12801 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80010. Phone: 303-724-3850; Fax: 303-724-3892; E-mail: gail.eckhardt{at}uchsc.edu.

Purpose: This in vivo study was designed to determine the optimal doses and schedules of vandetanib, a dual epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with irinotecan in a murine xenograft model of human colon cancer.

Experimental Design: HT-29 tumor-bearing nude mice were treated with two doses of vandetanib (12.5 and 25 mg/kg/d) with or without irinotecan (100 mg/kg) using either sequential or concurrent schedules for 30 days. Tumor size was measured using standard variables, whereas the antiangiogenic response was evaluated using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, effects on EGFR-dependent signal transduction pathways and proliferation were assessed using immunohistochemistry. These pharmacodynamic end points were then evaluated for associations with antitumor efficacy and/or to plasma/tumor concentrations of vandetanib.

Results: The greatest antitumor efficacy was observed in the groups receiving the highest dose of vandetanib given continuously (concurrent schedule), alone or in combination with irinotecan. These dosing schedules resulted in significant effects on tumor vasculature, with decreased volume transfer constants, area under the curve, and permeability surface factor as well as increased gadolinium clearance after 30 days of treatment. In addition, these groups showed the greatest inhibition of EGFR signaling. Interestingly, tumor concentrations of vandetanib were increased by irinotecan in the concurrent schedule, possibly due to decreased tumor perfusion in this group.

Conclusions: These data suggest that higher, sustained concentrations of vandetanib (versus intermittent), alone and in combination with irinotecan, result in optimal antitumor efficacy in this model and may have implications for the design of future clinical studies with this drug.