Clinical Cancer Research CR Helping Patients Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Clinical Cancer Research 13, 1192, February 15, 2007. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2706
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miyake, H.
Right arrow Articles by Fujisawa, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miyake, H.
Right arrow Articles by Fujisawa, M.

Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Quantitative Detection of Micrometastases in Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer by Real-time Reverse Transcriptase-PCR

Hideaki Miyake1, Isao Hara1, Toshifumi Kurahashi1, Taka-aki Inoue2, Hiroshi Eto2 and Masato Fujisawa1

Authors' Affiliations: 1 Department of Urology, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan and 2 Department of Urology, Hyogo Medical Center for Adults, Akashi, Japan

Requests for reprints: Hideaki Miyake, Department of Urology, Kobe University School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan. Phone: 81-78382-6155; Fax: 81-78382-6169; E-mail: hideakimiyake{at}hotmail.com.

Purpose: Routine pathologic examination can miss micrometastatic tumor foci in the lymph nodes of patients with prostate cancer, resulting in confusion during tumor staging and clinical decision-making. The objective of this study was to clarify the significance of micrometastases in pelvic lymph nodes in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Experimental Design: The expression of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in 2,215 lymph nodes isolated from 120 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer was assessed by a fully quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR. We regarded specimens in which either PSA or PSMA mRNAs were positive as proof of the "presence of micrometastasis." Immunohistochemical staining of lymph node specimens with an antibody against PSA was also done.

Results: Pathologic examinations detected tumor cells in 29 lymph nodes from 11 patients, and real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR further identified micrometastasis in 143 lymph nodes from 32 patients with no pathologic evidence of lymph node involvement. The presence of micrometastatic cancer cells was confirmed by immunohistochemical staining in 61 lymph nodes from 17 patients with pathologically negative lymph nodes. The presence of micrometastases was significantly associated with other conventional prognostic variables, including serum PSA value, pathologic stage, Gleason score, and tumor volume. Biochemical recurrence was detected in 32 patients, 17 of whom were negative for lymph node metastasis by pathologic examination (including 4 patients with pathologically organ-confined disease), but were diagnosed as having micrometastasis. Biochemical recurrence–free survival rate in patients without micrometastasis was significantly higher than in those with micrometastasis irrespective of the presence of pathologically positive nodes. Furthermore, only the presence of micrometastasis was independently associated with biochemical recurrence regardless of other factors examined.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that ~30% of clinically localized prostate cancers shed cancer cells to the pelvic lymph nodes, and that biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy could be explained, at least in part, by micrometastases in pelvic lymph nodes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. Benlloch, J. M. Galbis-Caravajal, C. Alenda, F. M. Peiro, M. Sanchez-Ronco, J. M. Rodriguez-Paniagua, B. Baschwitz, E. Rojas, and B. Massuti
Expression of molecular markers in mediastinal nodes from resected stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): prognostic impact and potential role as markers of occult micrometastases
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 91 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. Thurairaja, U. E. Studer, and F. C. Burkhard
Indications, Extent, and Benefits of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Patients with Bladder and Prostate Cancer
Oncologist, January 1, 2009; 14(1): 40 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Roach III
Targeting Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Men With Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer, and Confusion About the Results of the Randomized Trials
J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2008; 26(22): 3816 - 3817.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association for Cancer Research.