Clinical Cancer Research Holland2
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Clinical Cancer Research 13, 1775-1782, March 15, 2007. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1863
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solit, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Scher, H. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solit, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Scher, H. I.
Related Collections
Right arrowCommentary

Cancer Therapy: Clinical

Phase I Trial of 17-Allylamino-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin in Patients with Advanced Cancer

David B. Solit1, S. Percy Ivy6, Catherine Kopil1, Rachel Sikorski7, Michael J. Morris1, Susan F. Slovin1, W. Kevin Kelly1, Anthony DeLaCruz1, Tracy Curley1, Glenn Heller2, Steven Larson3, Lawrence Schwartz4, Merrill J. Egorin7, Neal Rosen1,5 and Howard I. Scher1

Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Medicine, 2 Biostatistics, 3 Nuclear Medicine, 4 Radiology, and 5 Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; 6 Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Centers, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; and 7 Molecular Therapeutics/Drug Discovery Program, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Requests for reprints: Howard I. Scher, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021. Phone: 646-422-4323; Fax: 212-988-0851; E-mail: scherh{at}mskcc.org.

Purpose: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) when administered using continuous and intermittent dosing schedules.

Experimental Design: Patients with progressive solid tumor malignancies were treated with 17-AAG using an accelerated titration dose escalation schema. The starting dose and schedule were 5 mg/m2 daily for 5 days with cycles repeated every 21 days. Dosing modifications based on safety, pharmacodynamic modeling, and clinical outcomes led to the evaluation of the following schedules: daily x 3 repeated every 14 days; twice weekly (days 1, 4, 8, and 11) for 2 weeks every 3 weeks; and twice weekly (days 1 and 4) without interruption. During cycle 1, blood was collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies.

Results: Fifty-four eligible patients were treated. The MTD was schedule dependent: 56 mg/m2 on the daily x 5 schedule; 112 mg/m2 on the daily x 3 schedule; and 220 mg/m2 on the days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every-21-day schedule. Continuous twice-weekly dosing was deemed too toxic because of delayed hepatotoxicity. Hepatic toxicity was also dose limiting with the daily x 5 schedule. Other common toxicities encountered were fatigue, myalgias, and nausea. This latter adverse effect may have been attributable, in part, to the DMSO-based formulation. Concentrations of 17-AAG above those required for activity in preclinical models could be safely achieved in plasma. Induction of a heat shock response and down-regulation of Akt and Raf-1 were observed in biomarker studies.

Conclusion: The MTD and toxicity profile of 17-AAG were schedule dependent. Intermittent dosing schedules were less toxic and are recommended for future phase II studies.


Commentary

Targeting the Molecular Chaperone Heat Shock Protein 90 Provides a Multifaceted Effect on Diverse Cell Signaling Pathways of Cancer Cells
Wanping Xu and Len Neckers
Clin. Cancer Res. 2007 13: 1625-1629. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Prevention ResearchHome page
D. Hughes, J. B. Guttenplan, C. B. Marcus, K. Subbaramaiah, and A. J. Dannenberg
Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitors Suppress Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-Mediated Activation of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 Transcription and DNA Adduct Formation
Cancer Prevention Research, November 1, 2008; 1(6): 485 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. N. Tse, D. S. Klimstra, M. Gonen, M. Shah, T. Sheikh, R. Sikorski, R. Carvajal, J. Mui, C. Tipian, E. O'Reilly, et al.
A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study of Irinotecan in Combination with 17-Allylamino-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin in Patients with Solid Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2008; 14(20): 6704 - 6711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. Dewaele, B. Wasag, J. Cools, R. Sciot, H. Prenen, P. Vandenberghe, A. Wozniak, P. Schoffski, P. Marynen, and M. Debiec-Rychter
Activity of Dasatinib, a Dual SRC/ABL Kinase Inhibitor, and IPI-504, a Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitor, against Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor-Associated PDGFRAD842V Mutation
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2008; 14(18): 5749 - 5758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. J. Ratain and R. H. Glassman
Reply to the Letter to the Editor from Banerji et al
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 14(8): 2514 - 2514.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
U. Banerji, A. Affolter, I. Judson, R. Marais, and P. Workman
BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: potential relationships to clinical response to HSP90 inhibitors
Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2008; 7(4): 737 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Faingold, J.-C. Marshall, E. Antecka, S. Di Cesare, A. N. Odashiro, S. Bakalian, B. F. Fernandes, and M. N. Burnier Jr.
Immune Expression and Inhibition of Heat Shock Protein 90 in Uveal Melanoma
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2008; 14(3): 847 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Chandarlapaty, A. Sawai, Q. Ye, A. Scott, M. Silinski, K. Huang, P. Fadden, J. Partdrige, S. Hall, P. Steed, et al.
SNX2112, a Synthetic Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitor, Has Potent Antitumor Activity against HER Kinase Dependent Cancers
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 240 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. J. Gray Jr., M. A. Stevenson, and S. K. Calderwood
Targeting Cdc37 Inhibits Multiple Signaling Pathways and Induces Growth Arrest in Prostate Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 67(24): 11942 - 11950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Modi, A. T. Stopeck, M. S. Gordon, D. Mendelson, D. B. Solit, R. Bagatell, W. Ma, J. Wheler, N. Rosen, L. Norton, et al.
Combination of Trastuzumab and Tanespimycin (17-AAG, KOS-953) Is Safe and Active in Trastuzumab-Refractory HER-2 Overexpressing Breast Cancer: A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 25(34): 5410 - 5417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
W. Xu and L. Neckers
Targeting the Molecular Chaperone Heat Shock Protein 90 Provides a Multifaceted Effect on Diverse Cell Signaling Pathways of Cancer Cells
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2007; 13(6): 1625 - 1629.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association for Cancer Research.