This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Data, Feng, et al. Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Feng, F. Y. Articles by Nyati, M. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Feng, F. Y. Articles by Nyati, M. K.

Effect of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Class in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer with Concurrent Radiochemotherapy In vivo

Authors' Affiliations: Departments of ¹ Radiation Oncology and ² Pathology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Requests for reprints: Mukesh K. Nyati, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Room 3011, 1331 East Ann Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Phone: 734-936-9163; Fax: 734-763-1581; E-mail: nyati{at}umich.edu.

Purpose: To optimally integrate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors into the clinical treatment of head and neck cancer, two important questions must be answered: (a) does EGFR inhibition add to the effects of radiochemotherapy, and (b) if so, which method of inhibiting EGFR is superior (an EGFR antibody versus a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor)? We designed an in vivo study to address these questions.

Experimental Design: Nude mice with UMSCC-1 head and neck cancer xenografts received either single, double, or triple agent therapy with an EGFR inhibitor (either cetuximab or gefitinib), gemcitabine, and/or radiation for 3 weeks. Tumor volumes and animal weights were measured for up to 15 weeks. Immunoblotting and immunofluorescent staining were done on tumors treated with either cetuximab or gefitinib alone.

Results: The addition of an EGFR inhibitor significantly delayed the tumor volume doubling time, from a median of 40 days with radiochemotherapy (gemcitabine and radiation) alone, to 106 days with cetuximab and 66 days with gefitinib (both P < 0.005). Cetuximab resulted in significantly less weight loss than gefitinib. Immunoblot analysis and immunofluorescent staining of tumors show that although levels of phosphorylated AKT and extracellular signal–regulated kinase were decreased similarly in response to cetuximab or gefitinib, cetuximab caused prolonged suppression of pEGFR, pSTAT3, and Bcl_XL compared with gefitinib.

Conclusions: EGFR inhibition, particularly with cetuximab, improves the effectiveness of radiochemotherapy in this model of head and neck cancer. The correlation of response with prolonged suppression of EGFR, STAT3, and Bcl_XL offers the possibility that these may be candidate biomarkers for response.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Morgan, L. A. Parsels, L. E. Kollar, D. P. Normolle, J. Maybaum, and T. S. Lawrence The Combination of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors with Gemcitabine and Radiation in Pancreatic Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 14(16): 5142 - 5149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]