This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Data Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Van den Eynden, G. G. Articles by Foekens, J. A. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Van den Eynden, G. G. Articles by Foekens, J. A.

Gene Expression Profiles Associated with the Presence of a Fibrotic Focus and the Growth Pattern in Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Translational Cancer Research Group (Lab Pathology University of Antwerp/University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium; Oncology Center, St. Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium), Antwerp, Belgium; and ² Departments of Medical Oncology and ³ Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Requests for reprints: Gert G. Van den Eynden, Department of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, B2650 Edegem, Belgium. Phone: 32-3-443-36-37; Fax: 32-3-443-30-36; E-mail: vandeneyndeng{at}hotmail.com.

Purpose: A fibrotic focus, the scar-like area found in the center of an invasive breast tumor, is a prognostic parameter associated with an expansive growth pattern, hypoxia, and (lymph)angiogenesis. Little is known about the molecular pathways involved.

Experimental Design: Sixty-five patients were selected of whom microarray data of the tumor and H&E slides for histologic analysis were available. The growth pattern and the presence and size of a fibrotic focus were assessed. Differences in biological pathways were identified with global testing. The correlations of growth pattern and fibrotic focus with common breast cancer signatures and with clinicopathologic variables and survival were investigated.

Results: Tumors with a large fibrotic focus showed activation of Ras signaling and of the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 pathway. Furthermore, unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis with hypoxia- and (lymph)angiogenesis-related genes showed that hypoxia-inducible factor-1, vascular endothelial growth factor A, and carbonic anhydrase 9 were overexpressed. The presence of a fibrotic focus, especially a large fibrotic focus, was associated with the basal-like subtype (P = 0.009), an activated wound-healing signature (P = 0.06), and a poor-prognosis 76-gene signature (P = 0.004). The presence of a fibrotic focus (P = 0.02) and especially of a large fibrotic focus (P = 0.004) was also associated with early development of distant metastasis.

Conclusions: Our results sustain the hypothesis that hypoxia-driven angiogenesis is essential in the biology of a fibrotic focus. Ras and Akt might play a role as downstream modulators. Our data furthermore suggest that vascular endothelial growth factor A does not only drive angiogenesis but also lymphangiogenesis in tumors with a fibrotic focus. Our data also show an association between the presence of a fibrotic focus and infaust molecular signatures.