This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mosquera, J.-M. Articles by Rubin, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mosquera, J.-M. Articles by Rubin, M. A.

Characterization of TMPRSS2-ERG Fusion High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Potential Clinical Implications

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; ² Harvard Medical School; ³ Departments of Pathology and Urology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; ⁴ Dana-Farber Harvard Comprehensive Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts; ⁵ Department of Pathology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; ⁶ Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California; ⁷ Departments of Pathology and Oncology, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ⁸ Department of Pathology and Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; ⁹ Departments of Pathology and Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and ¹⁰ Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Requests for reprints: Mark A. Rubin, Department of Pathology, C-410A, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065-4896. Phone: 212-746-6313; Fax: 212-746-8816; E-mail: rubinma{at}med.cornell.edu.

Purpose: More than 1,300,000 prostate needle biopsies are done annually in the United States with up to 16% incidence of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). HGPIN has low predictive value for identifying prostate cancer on subsequent needle biopsies in prostate-specific antigen–screened populations. In contemporary series, prostate cancer is detected in 20% of repeat biopsies following a diagnosis of HGPIN. Further, discrete histologic subtypes of HGPIN with clinical implication in management have not been characterized. The TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion that has recently been described in prostate cancer has also been shown to occur in a subset of HGPIN. This may have significant clinical implications given that TMPRSS2-ERG fusion prostate cancer is associated with a more aggressive clinical course.

Experimental Design: In this study, we assessed a series of HGPIN lesions and paired prostate cancer for the presence of TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion.

Results: Fusion-positive HGPIN was observed in 16% of the 143 number of lesions, and in all instances, the matching cancer shared the same fusion pattern. Sixty percent of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion prostate cancer had fusion-negative HGPIN.

Conclusions: Given the more aggressive nature of TMPRSS2-ERG prostate cancer, the findings of this study raise the possibility that gene fusion-positive HGPIN lesions are harbingers of more aggressive disease. To date, pathologic, molecular, and clinical variables do not help stratify which men with HGPIN are at increased risk for a cancer diagnosis. Our results suggest that the detection of isolated TMPRSS2-ERG fusion HGPIN would improve the positive predictive value of finding TMPRSS2-ERG fusion prostate cancer in subsequent biopsies.