Clinical Cancer Research Bridging the Lab and the Clinic in Cancer Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Clinical Cancer Research 14, 3664-3669, June 15, 2008. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4559
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calvert, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Plummer, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calvert, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Plummer, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Research
Right arrow Clinical Research: Clinical Pharmacology

CCR Focus

The Development of Phase I Cancer Trial Methodologies: the Use of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic End Points Sets the Scene for Phase 0 Cancer Clinical Trials

A. Hilary Calvert and Ruth Plummer

Authors' Affiliations: Newcastle General Hospital, New Castle, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: A. Hilary Calvert, Newcastle General Hospital, Framlington Place, Newcastle NE2 4HH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-191-256-3599; Fax: 44-191-273-4867; E-mail: hilary.calvert{at}newcastle.ac.uk.

Abstract

Although the concept of a phase 0 trial is a relatively new one, there has been a slowly increasing trend toward basing early clinical trial designs on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic end points that has been developing over many years. This article will review the early cancer trial methodologies and the various techniques that have been used to refine them. Several illustrative examples will be presented showing their relevance to trial designs using pharmacodynamic end points and targeted agents. Some criteria for characterizing suitable phase 0 end points are suggested. Four trial designs that are essentially developed for cytotoxic agents using the maximal tolerated dose as an end point are described. Although these trials were not designed with the use of more sophisticated pharmacodynamic end points (such as the measurement of the effect of a targeted agent on its target), they have been developed to optimize the speed with which a dose needed to achieve a particular effect can be determined and are, to this extent, relevant to the design of studies with pharmacodynamic end points.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CRO ContentHome page
G. C. Prendergast
Translational Research: Speeding New Concepts between Lab and Clinic
Cancer Reviews Online Content, July 1, 2008; 2008(7): 13 - 14.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. H. Doroshow and R. E. Parchment
Oncologic Phase 0 Trials Incorporating Clinical Pharmacodynamics: from Concept to Patient
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3658 - 3663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Jacobson-Kram and G. Mills
Leveraging Exploratory Investigational New Drug Studies to Accelerate Drug Development
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3670 - 3674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. J. Murgo, S. Kummar, L. Rubinstein, M. Gutierrez, J. Collins, R. Kinders, R. E. Parchment, J. Ji, S. M. Steinberg, S. X. Yang, et al.
Designing Phase 0 Cancer Clinical Trials
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3675 - 3682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. Eliopoulos, V. Giranda, R. Carr, R. Tiehen, T. Leahy, and G. Gordon
Phase 0 Trials: An Industry Perspective
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3683 - 3688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Cancer Research.