
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
CCR Focus |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis and 2 Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland and 3 Laboratory of Human Toxicology and Pharmacology, Applied/Developmental Research Support Directorate, Science Applications International Corporation-Frederick, Inc., National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland
Requests for reprints: Anthony J. Murgo, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Building 31, Room 3A44, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-2440. Phone: 301-496-4291; Fax: 301-496-4291; E-mail: murgoa{at}mail.nih.gov.
Abstract
Phase 0 trials are designed primarily to evaluate the pharmacodynamic and/or pharmacokinetic properties of selected investigational agents before initiating more traditional phase I testing. One of the major objectives of phase 0 trials is to interrogate and refine a target or biomarker assay for drug effect in human samples implementing procedures developed and validated in preclinical models. Thus, close collaboration between laboratory scientists and clinical investigators is essential to the design and conduct of phase 0 trials. Given the relatively small number of patients and tissue samples, showing a significant drug effect in phase 0 trials requires precise and reproducible assay procedures and innovative statistical methodology. Furthermore, phase 0 trials involving limited exposure of a study agent administered at low doses and/or for a short period allow them to be initiated under the Food and Drug Administration exploratory investigational new drug guidance with less preclinical toxicity data than usually required for traditional first-in-human studies. Because of the very limited drug exposure, phase 0 trials offer no chance of therapeutic benefit, which can impede patient enrollment, particularly if invasive tumor biopsies are required. The challenges to accrual are not insurmountable, however, and well-designed and executed phase 0 trials are feasible and have great potential for improving the efficiency and success of subsequent trials, particularly those evaluating molecularly targeted agents.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. C. Prendergast Translational Research: Speeding New Concepts between Lab and Clinic Cancer Reviews Online Content, July 1, 2008; 2008(7): 13 - 14. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Doroshow and R. E. Parchment Oncologic Phase 0 Trials Incorporating Clinical Pharmacodynamics: from Concept to Patient Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3658 - 3663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Calvert and R. Plummer The Development of Phase I Cancer Trial Methodologies: the Use of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic End Points Sets the Scene for Phase 0 Cancer Clinical Trials Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3664 - 3669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Jacobson-Kram and G. Mills Leveraging Exploratory Investigational New Drug Studies to Accelerate Drug Development Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3670 - 3674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Eliopoulos, V. Giranda, R. Carr, R. Tiehen, T. Leahy, and G. Gordon Phase 0 Trials: An Industry Perspective Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3683 - 3688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gutierrez and D. Collyar Patient Perspectives on Phase 0 Clinical Trials Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3689 - 3691. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |