Clinical Cancer Research Bridging the Lab and the Clinic in Cancer Medicine Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Clinical Cancer Research 14, 4455-4462, July 15, 2008. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5268
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nadler, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kluger, Y.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nadler, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kluger, Y.

Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Expression of Aurora A (but Not Aurora B) Is Predictive of Survival in Breast Cancer

Yasmine Nadler1, Robert L. Camp2, Candice Schwartz1, David L. Rimm2, Harriet M. Kluger1 and Yuval Kluger3

Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Medicine and 2 Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and 3 Department of Cell Biology, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, New York

Requests for reprints: Yuval Kluger, Skirball Institute, 3rd Floor, 540 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016. Phone: 212-263-8289; Fax: 509-753-3713; E-mail: Kluger{at}Saturn.med.nyu.edu.

Purpose: The cell cycle mediators Aurora A and B are targets of drugs currently in clinical development. As with other targeted therapies in breast cancer, response to therapy might be associated with target expression in tumors. We therefore assessed expression of Aurora A and B in breast tumors and studied associations with clinical/pathologic variables.

Experimental Design: Tissue microarrays containing primary specimens from 638 patients with 15-year follow-up were employed to assess expression of Aurora A and B using our automated quantitative analysis method; we used cytokeratin to define pixels as breast cancer (tumor mask) within the array spot and measured Aurora A and B expression within the mask using Cy5-conjugated antibodies.

Results: Aurora A and B expression was variable in primary breast tumors. High Aurora A expression was strongly associated with decreased survival (P = 0.0005). On multivariable analysis, it remained an independent prognostic marker. High Aurora A expression was associated with high nuclear grade and high HER-2/neu and progesterone receptor expression. Aurora B expression was not associated with survival.

Conclusions: Aurora A expression defines a population of patients with decreased survival, whereas Aurora B expression does not, suggesting that Aurora A might be the preferred drug target in breast cancer. Aurora A expression in early-stage breast cancer may identify a subset of patients requiring more aggressive or pathway-targeted treatment. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the prognostic role of Aurora A as well as the predictive role of Aurora A expression in patients treated with Aurora A inhibitors.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Cancer Research.