This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Data Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Desmedt, C. Articles by Sotiriou, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Desmedt, C. Articles by Sotiriou, C.

Biological Processes Associated with Breast Cancer Clinical Outcome Depend on the Molecular Subtypes

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Medical Oncology Department, Jules Bordet Institute; ² Machine Learning Group, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; ³ National Center of Competence in Research Molecular Oncology, Swiss Institute of Experimental Cancer Research, Epalinges, Switzerland; ⁴ Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland; and ⁵ International Drug Development Institute, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium

Requests for reprints: Christos Sotiriou, Translational Research Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Jules Bordet Institute, 125 Boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. Phone: 32-2-541-3428; Fax: 11-32-2-538-0858; E-mail: christos.sotiriou{at}bordet.be.

Purpose: Recently, several prognostic gene expression signatures have been identified; however, their performance has never been evaluated according to the previously described molecular subtypes based on the estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and their biological meaning has remained unclear. Here we aimed to perform a comprehensive meta-analysis integrating both clinicopathologic and gene expression data, focusing on the main molecular subtypes.

Experimental Design: We developed gene expression modules related to key biological processes in breast cancer such as tumor invasion, immune response, angiogenesis, apoptosis, proliferation, and ER and HER2 signaling, and then analyzed these modules together with clinical variables and several prognostic signatures on publicly available microarray studies (>2,100 patients).

Results: Multivariate analysis showed that in the ER+/HER2– subgroup, only the proliferation module and the histologic grade were significantly associated with clinical outcome. In the ER–/HER2– subgroup, only the immune response module was associated with prognosis, whereas in the HER2+ tumors, the tumor invasion and immune response modules displayed significant association with survival. Proliferation was identified as the most important component of several prognostic signatures, and their performance was limited to the ER+/HER2– subgroup.

Conclusions: Although proliferation is the strongest parameter predicting clinical outcome in the ER+/HER2– subtype and the common denominator of most prognostic gene signatures, immune response and tumor invasion seem to be the main molecular processes associated with prognosis in the ER–/HER2– and HER2+ subgroups, respectively. These findings may help to define new clinicogenomic models and to identify new therapeutic strategies in the specific molecular subgroups.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Schmidt, J. G. Hengstler, C. von Torne, H. Koelbl, and M. C. Gehrmann Coordinates in the Universe of Node-Negative Breast Cancer Revisited Cancer Res., April 1, 2009; 69(7): 2695 - 2698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hugh, J. Hanson, M. C. U. Cheang, T. O. Nielsen, C. M. Perou, C. Dumontet, J. Reed, M. Krajewska, I. Treilleux, M. Rupin, et al. Breast Cancer Subtypes and Response to Docetaxel in Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Use of an Immunohistochemical Definition in the BCIRG 001 Trial J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2009; 27(8): 1168 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Sotiriou and L. Pusztai Gene-Expression Signatures in Breast Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., February 19, 2009; 360(8): 790 - 800. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. P. Schneider, E. P. Winer, W. D. Foulkes, J. Garber, C. M. Perou, A. Richardson, G. W. Sledge, and L. A. Carey Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Risk Factors to Potential Targets Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2008; 14(24): 8010 - 8018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]