This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rodriguez, R. Articles by Meuth, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rodriguez, R. Articles by Meuth, M.

Thymidine Selectively Enhances Growth Suppressive Effects of Camptothecin/Irinotecan in MSI+ Cells and Tumors Containing a Mutation of MRE11

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Sheffield, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sheffield, United Kingdom, ² Institute of Biomedicine, The Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and ³ Department of Genetics Microbiology and Toxicology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

Requests for reprints: Mark Meuth, Institute for Cancer Studies, The University of Sheffield, Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-114-271-3288; Fax: 44-114-271-3515; E-mail: m.meuth{at}sheffield.ac.uk.

Purpose: DNA synthesis inhibitors and damaging agents are widely used in cancer therapy; however, sensitivity of tumors to such agents is highly variable. The response of tumor cells in culture to these agents is strongly influenced by the status of DNA damage response pathways. Here, we attempt to exploit the altered response of mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient colon cancer cells and tumors to camptothecin or irinotecan and thymidine by combining them to improve therapeutic response.

Experimental Design: A panel of colon cancer cell lines was assayed for response to camptothecin-thymidine combinations by measuring colony formation, cell cycle distribution, and senescence. Cell strains defective in p53, p21, or Mre11 were used in these assays to investigate the role of these cell cycle regulators. The in vivo antitumor response of xenografts to irinotecan and thymidine combinations was assessed in nude mice.

Results: Camptothecin-thymidine combinations suppress colony formation of MMR-deficient tumor cells 10- to 3,000-fold relative to that obtained with camptothecin alone and significantly reduce the concentrations of the agents required to induce late S/G₂ arrest and senescence. Sensitivity is not a direct result of MMR, p53, or p21 status. However MMR-deficient cell lines containing an intronic frameshift mutation of MRE11 show greatest sensitivity to these agents. Increased sensitivity to this combination is also evident in vivo as thymidine enhances irinotecan-induced growth suppression of MMR-deficient tumors carrying the MRE11 mutation in mouse xenografts.

Conclusion: Irinotecan-thymidine combinations may be particularly effective when targeted to MSI+ tumors containing this readily detectable MRE11 mutation.