This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shariat, S. F. Articles by Slawin, K. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shariat, S. F. Articles by Slawin, K. M. Related Collections Commentary

Herbal/Hormonal Dietary Supplement Possibly Associated with Prostate Cancer Progression

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, ² Scott Department of Urology, and ³ Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Requests for reprints: Shahrokh F. Shariat, Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9110. Phone: 469-363-8500; Fax: 214-648-8786; E-mail: Shahrokh.Shariat{at}UTSouthwestern.edu.

Background: Patients seek herbal/hormonal dietary supplements (HHDS) to prevent and/or solve health and aging issues. After two men developed an unusual course of clinically aggressive prostate cancer within months of starting daily consumption of the same HHDS product, we investigated the effect of this product on prostate cancer progression.

Methods: We evaluated serum levels of total testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone and screened prostate biopsy and metastatic specimens for androgen receptor protein expression and mutations. We did hormone analyses and capillary electrophoresis. We tested the effect of the HHDS product on androgen receptor-negative (DU-145 and PC-3) and androgen receptor-positive (LNCaP) human prostate cancer cell lines.

Results: Both patients had low hormone levels. The androgen receptor was expressed in all primary and metastatic prostate cancer tissues and no mutations were identified. Hormone analysis revealed that the HHDS contained testosterone and estradiol. The HHDS product was a more potent dose-dependent stimulator of cancer cell growth than testosterone both in androgen receptor-negative and receptor-positive cell lines. Blocking experiments with increasing concentrations of bicalutamide did not prevent the HHDS product–stimulated growth. We filed an adverse event report with the Food and Drug Administration who issued a warning letter. The manufacturer responded by removing this HHDS product from the market.

Conclusions: The HHDS product contained one or more endocrinologically active tumor-promoting components that had cellular androgen receptor status–independent activity. The HHDS product exhibited potent prostate cancer growth stimulatory activity that was more powerful than that of testosterone, independent of the androgen-receptor status of prostate cancer cells, and resistant to antiandrogen blockade.

Commentary

Hearsay Medicine Is Not Evidence-Based Medicine

Robert S. DiPaola and Michael A. Gallo
Clin. Cancer Res. 2008 14: 337-338. [Full Text] [PDF]