This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Couvelard, A. Articles by Bedossa, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Couvelard, A. Articles by Bedossa, P.

Overexpression of the Oxygen Sensors PHD-1, PHD-2, PHD-3, and FIH Is Associated with Tumor Aggressiveness in Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Departments of Pathology, ² Gastroenterology, ³ Surgery, University Paris 7; APHP, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France; and ⁴ Cancer Research UK, Tumor Pathology Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Anne Couvelard, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Beaujon, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy France. Phone: 331-40-87-54-62; Fax: 331-408-700-77; E-mail: anne.couvelard{at}bjn.ap-hop-paris.fr.

Purpose: Tumor hypoxia is associated with poor prognosis and resistance to treatment. Our aim was to assess the expression of proteins that act as cellular oxygen sensors, directly regulating the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) pathway, i.e., prolyl hydroxylase domain proteins (PHD)-1, PHD-2, PHD-3, and FIH in pancreatic endocrine tumors (PET).

Experimental Design: Immunohistochemical expression of these markers was examined in 109 PET included in tissue microarrays and representing various stages of tumorigenesis. The results were correlated with histoprognostic factors including Ki-67 index, presence of a fibrotic focus, and microvascular density (MVD).

Results: The cytoplasmic and nuclear expressions of the three PHD isoforms were associated, and their expression was significantly higher in aggressive PETS, malignant, with lymph node metastases or with lower MVD. High nuclear expression of the three isoforms highly correlated with HIF-1 nuclear expression (P = 0.02, 0.003, and 0.006, respectively). Moreover, high nuclear PHD-1 or PHD-3 expression was associated with a poorer survival (P = 0.01). Cytoplasmic FIH was significantly higher in malignant PETs (P = 0.05) and in PETs with lymph node metastases (P = 0.02), and its expression correlated positively with those of cytoplasmic PHD isoforms (P < 0001). FIH stromal expression was found in 23% of PETs and correlated with higher FIH nuclear expression (P = 0.0004) and poorer disease-free survival (P = 0.0018).

Conclusion: HIF regulatory proteins are highly expressed in PET and their expression is correlated with tumor metastases, tumor recurrence, and prognosis. These molecules that play an important role in the control of hypoxia-induced genes may have a function in the regulation of cellular proliferation and differentiation during endocrine tumorigenesis.