This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dowsett, M. Articles by Dunbier, A. K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dowsett, M. Articles by Dunbier, A. K. Related Collections Clinical Research Clinical Research: Response Markers and Mechanisms

Emerging Biomarkers and New Understanding of Traditional Markers in Personalized Therapy for Breast Cancer

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Academic Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital and ² The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Anita K. Dunbier, Academic Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London, SW36JJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-207-808-2883; Fax: 44-207-376-3918; E-mail: anita.dunbier{at}icr.ac.uk.

Abstract

The era of personalized medicine is likely to see an escalation in the use of biomarkers to ensure breast cancer patients receive optimal treatment. A combination of prognostic and predictive biomarkers should enable better quantification of the residual risk faced by patients and indicate the potential value of additional treatment. Established biomarkers such as estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor already play a significant role in the selection of patients for endocrine therapy. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is recognized as a strong predictor of response to trastuzumab whereas, more recently, the role of estrogen receptor and HER2 as negative and positive indicators for chemotherapy has also been explored. Ki67 has traditionally been recognized as a modest prognostic factor, but recent neoadjuvant studies suggest that on-treatment measurement may be a more effective predictor of treatment efficacy for both endocrine treatment and chemotherapy. The last decade has seen the emergence of numerous multigene expression profiles that aim to outdo traditional predictive and prognostic factors. The Oncotype DX assay and the MammaPrint profile are currently undergoing prospective clinical trials to clearly define their role. Other gene expression–based assays also show potential but are yet to be tested clinically. Rigorous comparison of these emerging markers with current treatment selection criteria will be required to determine whether they offer significant benefit to justify their use.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Goldhirsch, J. N. Ingle, R. D. Gelber, A. S. Coates, B. Thurlimann, H.-J. Senn, and Panel members Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009 Ann. Onc., June 17, 2009; (2009) mdp322v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Chen, N. Guggisberg, M. Jorda, A. Gonzalez-Angulo, B. Hennessy, G. B. Mills, C.-K. Tan, and J. M. Slingerland Combined Src and Aromatase Inhibition Impairs Human Breast Cancer Growth In vivo and Bypass Pathways Are Activated in AZD0530-Resistant Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2009; 15(10): 3396 - 3405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. I. Olopade, T. A. Grushko, R. Nanda, and D. Huo Advances in Breast Cancer: Pathways to Personalized Medicine Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2008; 14(24): 7988 - 7999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-H. Tan, S.-C. Lee, B.-C. Goh, and J. Wong Pharmacogenetics in Breast Cancer Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2008; 14(24): 8027 - 8041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]