Clinical Cancer Research CR Balducci Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Clinical Cancer Research 14, 715, February 1, 2008. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1762
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evilevitch, V.
Right arrow Articles by Eilber, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evilevitch, V.
Right arrow Articles by Eilber, F. C.

Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Reduction of Glucose Metabolic Activity Is More Accurate than Change in Size at Predicting Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

Vladimir Evilevitch2, Wolfgang A. Weber1,2, William D. Tap3,9, Martin Allen-Auerbach2, Kira Chow4,9, Scott D. Nelson5,9, Fredrick R. Eilber8,9, Jeffery J. Eckardt6,9, Robert M. Elashoff7, Michael E. Phelps2, Johannes Czernin2 and Fritz C. Eilber8,9

Authors' Affiliations: 1 Abteilung Nuklearmedizin (University of Freiburg), Freiburg, Germany; 2 Ahmanson Biological Imaging Division, 3 Division of Medical Oncology, 4 Department of Radiology, 5 Department of Pathology, 6 Division of Orthopedic Oncology, 7 Department of Biostatistics, 8 Division of Surgical Oncology, and 9 UCLA Sarcoma Program, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

Requests for reprints: Fritz C. Eilber, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Room 54-140 CHS, 10833 LeConte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1782. Phone: 310-825-7575; E-mail: fceilber{at}mednet.ucla.edu.

Purpose: Change in tumor size as classified by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors poorly correlates with histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate whether positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) allows for a more accurate evaluation of histopathologic response.

Experimental Design: From January 2005 to January 2007, 42 patients with resectable biopsy-proven high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma underwent a FDG-PET/computed tomography scan before and after neoadjuvant treatment. Relative changes in tumor FDG uptake and size from the baseline to the follow-up scan were calculated, and their accuracy for assessment of histopathologic response was compared by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Histopathologic response was defined as ≥95% tumor necrosis.

Results: In histopathologic responders (n = 8; 19%), reduction in tumor FDG uptake was significantly greater than in nonresponders (P < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were found for tumor size (P = 0.24). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for metabolic changes was 0.93, but only 0.60 for size changes (P = 0.004). Using a 60% decrease in tumor FDG uptake as a threshold resulted in a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 71% for assessment of histopathologic response, whereas Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors showed a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 100%.

Conclusion: Quantitative FDG-PET was significantly more accurate than size-based criteria at assessing histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy. FDG-PET should be considered as a modality to monitor treatment response in patients with high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. R. Benz, J. Czernin, M. S. Allen-Auerbach, W. D. Tap, S. M. Dry, D. Elashoff, K. Chow, V. Evilevitch, J. J. Eckardt, M. E. Phelps, et al.
FDG-PET/CT Imaging Predicts Histopathologic Treatment Responses after the Initial Cycle of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcomas
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2009; 15(8): 2856 - 2863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. E. Laing, M. A. Walter, D. O. Campbell, H. R. Herschman, N. Satyamurthy, M. E. Phelps, J. Czernin, O. N. Witte, and C. G. Radu
Noninvasive prediction of tumor responses to gemcitabine using positron emission tomography
PNAS, February 24, 2009; 106(8): 2847 - 2852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
In VivoHome page
G. GHIGI, R. MICERA, A. M. MAFFIONE, P. CASTELLUCCI, S. CAMMELLI, I. AMMENDOLIA, C. NANNI, E. BARBIERI, G. GRASSETTO, S. FANTI, et al.
11C-Methionine vs. 18F-FDG PET in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Preliminary Results
In Vivo, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 105 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. H. Kushner, M. P. Laquaglia, W. L. Gerald, K. Kramer, S. Modak, and N.-K. V. Cheung
Solitary Relapse of Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor Detected by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2008; 26(30): 4995 - 4996.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. R. Benz, M. S. Allen-Auerbach, F. C. Eilber, H. J.J. Chen, S. Dry, M. E. Phelps, J. Czernin, and W. A. Weber
Combined Assessment of Metabolic and Volumetric Changes for Assessment of Tumor Response in Patients with Soft-Tissue Sarcomas
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 1579 - 1584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Cancer Research.