
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis |
Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Experimental Radiation Oncology and 2 Experimental Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Requests for reprints: Sunil Krishnan, Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, Unit 97, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: 713-563-2377; Fax: 713-563-2366; E-mail: skrishnan{at}mdanderson.org or Juri Gelovani, Department of Experimental Diagnostic Imaging, Unit 59, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: 713-563-3343; Fax: 713-745-7540; E-mail: jgelovani{at}di.mdacc.tmc.edu.
Purpose: To develop and validate an optical imaging nanoprobe for the discrimination of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR)–overexpressing tumors from surrounding normal tissues that also expresses EGFR.
Experimental Design: Near-infrared (NIR) quantum dots (QD) were coupled to EGF using thiol-maleimide conjugation to create EGF-QD nanoprobes. In vitro binding affinity of these nanoprobes and unconjugated QDs was evaluated in a panel of cell lines, with and without anti-EGFR antibody pretreatment. Serial optical imaging of HCT116 xenograft tumors was done after systemic injection of QD and EGF-QD.
Results: EGF-QD showed EGFR-specific binding in vitro. In vivo imaging showed three distinct phases, tumor influx (
3 min), clearance (
60 min), and accumulation (1-6 h), of EGF-QD nanoprobes. Both QD and EGF-QD showed comparable nonspecific rapid tumor influx and clearance followed by attainment of an apparent dynamic equilibrium at
60 min. Subsequently (1-6 h), whereas QD concentration gradually decreased in tumors, EGF-QDs progressively accumulated in tumors. On delayed imaging at 24 h, tumor fluorescence decreased to near-baseline levels for both QD and EGF-QD. Ex vivo whole-organ fluorescence, tissue homogenate fluorescence, and confocal microscopic analyses confirmed tumor-specific accumulation of EGF-QD at 4 h. Immunofluorescence images showed diffuse colocalization of EGF-QD fluorescence within EGFR-expressing tumor parenchyma compared with patchy perivascular sequestration of QD.
Conclusion: These results represent the first pharmacokinetic characterization of a robust EGFR imaging nanoprobe. The measurable contrast enhancement of tumors 4 h after systemic administration of EGF-QD and its subsequent normalization at 24 h imply that this nanoprobe may permit quantifiable and repetitive imaging of EGFR expression.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |