This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Fidler, M. J. Articles by Bonomi, P. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fidler, M. J. Articles by Bonomi, P.

The Potential Predictive Value of Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression and Increased Risk of Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Erlotinib and Celecoxib

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Rush University Medical Center; ² Northwestern University; ³ University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; ⁴ University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and ⁵ Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee

Requests for reprints: Mary Jo Fidler, Section of Medical Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street 821, Chicago, IL 60612. Phone: 312-942-3375; Fax: 312-942-3192; E-mail: mary_fidler{at}rush.edu.

Purpose: Celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, potentiates antitumor effects of erlotinib in preclinical studies, and COX-2 is frequently expressed in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With these observations, we designed a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib plus celecoxib in advanced NSCLC.

Experimental Design: Previously treated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients were given celecoxib at 400 mg orally twice daily and erlotinib at 150 mg orally daily until disease progression. Planned accrual was 40 patients. Tissue was collected for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) analysis and COX-2 immunohistochemistry.

Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled (17 men, 9 women; median age, 66 years). Eighteen and 21 patients had tissue available for EGFR analysis and COX-2 immunohistochemistry, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 2.0 and 9.2 months, respectively. Eleven of 21 patients tested had increased tumor COX-2 expression, which was strongly associated with prolonged PFS (P = 0.048). Four patients on anticoagulation or with a history of peptic ulcer disease had grade 3/grade 4 upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), prompting early study closure. Three patients with GIB had endoscopy that found peptic ulcers.

Conclusions: The combination of erlotinib and celecoxib does not seem superior to erlotinib alone in unselected patients. However, longer PFS with high-tumor COX-2 expression suggests that trials of EGFR and COX-2 inhibitors may be warranted in this patient subset. GIB observed in our trial supports excluding patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease or those requiring therapeutic anticoagulation from future EGFR and COX-2 inhibitor studies.