Clinical Cancer Research The Science of Cancer Health Disparities Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foster, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Corbett, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foster, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Corbett, T. H.

Clinical Cancer Research, Vol 3, Issue 11 2047-2053, Copyright © 1997 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

Pharmacokinetic studies in mice of two new thioxanthenones (183577 and 232759) that showed preferential solid tumor activity

BJ Foster, RA Wiegand, S Pugh, PM LoRusso, J Rake and TH Corbett
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48202-0188, USA.

Two new thioxanthenones, 183577 and 232759, have rekindled interest in the development of representatives from this class of structures as useful anticancer agents. Although the mechanism of action is unknown, both compounds demonstrated a similar spectrum of solid tumor selectivity. 232759 was selected for clinical development because it showed no hepatotoxicity in preliminary studies, whereas 183577 showed hepatotoxicity but only at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The limiting toxicity for the clinical candidate was myelosuppression in preliminary studies. Plasma and tissue drug levels, as well as protein binding, were studied in mice using optimal administration times at the MTD for each drug (for 183577, this was a 4-h infusion at 1350 mg/m2 and for 232759, it was a 5-min injection at 240 mg/m2), as well as at one-half the MTD for the clinical candidate. The drugs were 96-100% bound by plasma proteins. The peak drug concentrations, half-life, and area under the concentration-time curve in plasma for 183577 were 3483 ng/ml, 465 min, and 2018 microgram/ml. min, respectively. The peak drug concentration, half-life, and area under the concentration-time curve in plasma for 232759 were 5257 ng/ml, 44 min, and 276 microgram/ml. min, respectively, at the MTD and 2810 ng/ml, 40 min, and 110 microgram/ml. min at one-half the MTD. In all instances of simultaneous measurements, drug concentrations were equal or higher in tissues than they were in plasma. Unlike the plasma and kidney concentrations of 183577, the liver concentrations did not show a declining trend over the 8-h observation period. Declines in plasma, liver, kidney, and tumor levels of 232759 were detected over the 8-h observation period. The sustained high 183577 concentration in liver is believed to be responsible for its prolonged half-life and hepatotoxicity. Evidence for metabolism of the parent drugs was based on the finding of additional peaks on the high-pressure liquid chromatography tracings. Future studies will focus on identification and antitumor studies of these presumed metabolites in hopes of a better understanding of the solid tumor activity profiles and toxic effects of these compounds.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. M. LoRusso, B. J. Foster, A. Wozniak, L. K. Heilbrun, J. I. McCormick, P. E. Ruble, M. A. Graham, J. Purvis, J. Rake, M. Drozd, et al.
Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of the Novel Antitumor Agent SR233377
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2000; 6(8): 3088 - 3094.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1997 by the American Association for Cancer Research.