Clinical Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kinsella, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kinsella, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, J. M.

Clinical Cancer Research, Vol 4, Issue 1 99-109, Copyright © 1998 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

Preclinical evaluation of 5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose as a prodrug for 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine-mediated radiosensitization in mouse and human tissues

TJ Kinsella, KA Kunugi, KA Vielhuber, DM Potter, ME Fitzsimmons and JM Collins
Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-5056, USA.

We reported previously that p.o. administered 5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose (IPdR) was efficiently converted to 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (IUdR) in athymic mice (T. J. Kinsella et al., Cancer Res., 54: 2695-2700, 1994). Here, we further evaluate IPdR metabolism, systemic toxicity, and percentage DNA incorporation in athymic mouse normal tissues and a human colon cancer xenograft (HT29) using higher p.o. doses of IPdR. These data are compared to results using a continuous infusion of IUdR at the maximum tolerable dose. We also evaluate IPdR metabolism in cytosolic extracts from normal human liver, normal human intestine, and human colorectal cancer specimens. Athymic mice tolerated a daily p.o. bolus of up to 2 g/kg IPdR for 6 days with minimal host toxicity (< or = 10% body weight loss). There was rapid conversion of IPdR to IUdR, with peak plasma levels of IUdR of 40-75 microM at 10 min following a p.o. IPdR bolus of 250-1500 mg/kg. The percentage IUdR-DNA in the HT29 s.c. human tumor xenografts increased 1.5 times (2.3-3.6%) with IPdR doses above 1 g/kg/day for 6 days, whereas the percentage IUdR-DNA incorporation in two proliferating normal tissues (4-4.5% in intestine; 1.6-2.2% in bone marrow) and a quiescent normal tissue (< or = 1% in liver) showed < 1.5-fold increases with the IPdR dose escalation between 1-2 g/kg/day for 6 days. In contrast, using a continuous infusion of IUdR at 100 mg/kg/day, significant systemic toxicity (> 20% body weight loss) was found by day 6 of the infusion. Steady-state plasma IUdR levels were 1.0-1.2 microM during the 6-day infusion, and percentage IUdR-DNA incorporations of 2.3, 8, 6, and 1% were measured in s.c. tumors, normal intestine, normal bone marrow, and normal liver, respectively, following the 6-day infusion. Thus, the p.o. IPdR schedule has an improved therapeutic index, based on percentage IUdR-DNA incorporation in normal and tumor tissues, compared to continuous infusion IUdR at the maximum tolerable dose in athymic mice with this human tumor xenograft. Additionally, a tumor regrowth assay to assess the radiation response of HT29 s.c. xenografts showed a 1.5-fold enhancement (time to regrow to 300% initial tumor volume) with IPdR (1000 mg/kg/day for 6 days) plus fractionated irradiation (XRT; 2 Gy/day for 4 days), compared to XRT (2 Gy/day for 4 days) alone. No enhancement in the radiation response of HT29 s.c. xenografts was found with continuous infusion IUdR (100 mg/kg/day for 6 days) plus XRT (2 Gy/day for 4 days), compared to XRT alone. Using cytosolic extracts from normal human liver specimens, we found a rapid (15-min) conversion of IPdR to IUdR. Coincubation of liver cytosol with IPdR and allopurinol, an inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, had no inhibitory effect on IPdR metabolism, whereas coincubation with IPdR and isovanillin or menadione, analogue substrates for aldehyde oxidase, effectively reduced the amount of IPdR oxidized to IUdR. Significantly less metabolism of IPdR to IUdR was seen in cytosolic extracts from normal human intestine specimens, and no metabolism of IPdR was found in cytosolic extracts from colorectal liver metastases in two patients and from the HT29 human colon cancer xenografts in athymic mice. These additional data indicate that IPdR has the potential for clinical use as a p.o. prodrug for IUdR-mediated radiosensitization of resistant human cancers.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Seo, T. Yan, J. E. Schupp, T. Radivoyevitch, and T. J. Kinsella
Schedule-Dependent Drug Effects of Oral 5-Iodo-2-Pyrimidinone-2'-Deoxyribose as an In vivo Radiosensitizer in U251 Human Glioblastoma Xenografts
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 11(20): 7499 - 7507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Seo, T. Yan, J. E. Schupp, V. Colussi, K. L. Taylor, and T. J. Kinsella
Differential Radiosensitization in DNA Mismatch Repair-Proficient and -Deficient Human Colon Cancer Xenografts with 5-Iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 10(22): 7520 - 7528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
M. Rooseboom, J. N. M. Commandeur, and N. P. E. Vermeulen
Enzyme-Catalyzed Activation of Anticancer Prodrugs
Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2004; 56(1): 53 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. E. Berry, T. W. Davis, J. E. Schupp, H.-S. Hwang, Niels de Wind, and T. J. Kinsella
Selective Radiosensitization of Drug-resistant MutS Homologue-2 (MSH2) Mismatch Repair-deficient Cells by Halogenated Thymidine (dThd) Analogues: Msh2 Mediates dThd Analogue DNA Levels and the Differential Cytotoxicity and Cell Cycle Effects of the dThd Analogues and 6-Thioguanine
Cancer Res., October 1, 2000; 60(20): 5773 - 5780.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. J. Kinsella, J. E. Schupp, T. W. Davis, S. E. Berry, H.-S. Hwang, K. Warren, F. Balis, J. Barnett, and H. Sands
Preclinical Study of the Systemic Toxicity and Pharmacokinetics of 5-Iodo-2-deoxypyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose as a Radiosensitizing Prodrug in Two, Non-Rodent Animal Species: Implications for Phase I Study Design
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2000; 6(9): 3670 - 3679.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. J. Kinsella, K. A. Vielhuber, K. A. Kunugi, J. Schupp, T. W. Davis, and H. Sands
Preclinical Toxicity and Efficacy Study of a 14-day Schedule of Oral 5-Iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose as a Prodrug for 5-Iodo-2'-deoxyuridine Radiosensitization in U251 Human Glioblastoma Xenografts
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2000; 6(4): 1468 - 1475.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1998 by the American Association for Cancer Research.