Clinical Cancer Research, Vol 4, Issue 2 483-491, Copyright © 1998 by American Association for Cancer Research

ARTICLES

Acute in vivo resistance in high-dose therapy

BA Teicher, G Ara, SR Keyes, RS Herbst and E Frei 3rd
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. teicher_beverly_a@lilly.com

In the design of sequential high-dose chemotherapy regimens, the selection of antitumor alkylating agents to be included in each intensification and the interval between the intensifications are critical to the design of the therapy. The tumor cell survival assay and tumor growth delay assay using the murine EMT-6 mammary carcinoma were used as a solid tumor model in which to address these issues. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with high-dose melphalan or cyclophosphamide followed 7 or 12 days later by melphalan, cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, or carboplatin. After treatment with melphalan both 7 and 12 days later, the tumor was resistant to each of the four drugs studied. After treatment with cyclophosphamide both 7 and 12 days later, the tumor was resistant to melphalan and thiotepa but was not resistant to cyclophosphamide or carboplatin. To extend the interval between high-dose treatments to 14 and 21 days, after the first intensification the tumor was transferred to second hosts that were either drug-treated or not drug treated. When high-dose melphalan-treated tumors were treated with a second high dose of melphalan, the tumors were very resistant with the 14-day interval and less resistant with the 21-day interval. This small effect was evident in the bone marrow colony-forming unit, granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM), except in the hosts pretreated with melphalan. When high-dose cyclophosphamide-treated tumors were treated with a second high dose of cyclophosphamide, drug resistance was observed both with the 14-day and 21-day interval if the host was non-pretreated or was pretreated with melphalan, but not if the host was pretreated with cyclophosphamide. The same was true in the bone marrow CFU-GM. Tumor growth delay studies supported these findings in that treatment with high-dose cyclophosphamide, melphalan, thiotepa, and carboplatin resulted in less than additive tumor growth delay, whereas treatment with high-dose cyclophosphamide prior to treatment with high-dose melphalan, cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, or carboplatin resulted in additivity to greater-than-additive tumor growth delay. High-dose combination regimens required dose reduction of the drugs, which resulted in decreased tumor growth delays.