Clinical Cancer Research, Vol 4, Issue 3 743-753, Copyright © 1998 by American Association for Cancer Research

ARTICLES

Studies of the efficacy and pharmacology of irinotecan against human colon tumor xenograft models

WC Zamboni, CF Stewart, PJ Cheshire, LB Richmond, SK Hanna, X Luo, C Poquette, JP McGovren, JA Houghton and PJ Houghton
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA.

Irinotecan, administered i.v. on days 1-5 and 8-12 [(dx5)2 i.v.] has demonstrated significant activity against advanced human tumor xenografts. To explore the feasibility of prolonged oral administration of irinotecan, we compared the efficacy of oral and i.v. irinotecan on the (dx5)2 schedule. We also evaluated oral therapy for 12 consecutive weeks [(dx5)12] at 25 and 50 mg/kg and two consecutive 5-day courses repeated every 21 days for up to four cycles ([(dx5)2]4) at 50 and 75 mg/kg/dose in a series of human colon carcinoma xenograft lines. In addition, we evaluated the effect of a sensitive (HC1) and resistant (ELC2) human colon adenocarcinoma xenograft on irinotecan and SN-38 lactone disposition after administration of irinotecan 10 mg/kg i.v. and 10 and 25 mg/kg p.o. Irinotecan i.v. at 40 mg/kg and oral at 50 and 75 mg/kg on the (dx5)2 schedule had similar activity against the panel of adult colon adenocarcinoma xenografts. Irinotecan given p.o. also demonstrated significant activity against a topotecan-resistant derivative, VRC5/TOPO. Oral administration of 75 mg/kg [(dx5)2]4 and 50 mg/kg (dx5)12 achieved complete response in five of seven xenograft lines evaluated. After i.v. administration, mice bearing HC1 xenografts had 43% greater SN-38 lactone systemic exposure compared to those with ELC2 xenografts and non-tumor-bearing mice. After oral (10 mg/kg) administration, there was a 5-fold higher molar formation of SN-38 lactone compared to i.v. (10 mg/kg) administration in tumor and non-tumor-bearing mice. SN-38 systemic exposure associated with the lowest oral dose (25 mg/kg) achieving complete response for HC1 was 942.6 ng/ml x h. These results emphasize the importance of pharmacokinetic studies as part of tumor response studies in xenograft models.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Stubdal, N. Perin, M. Lemmon, P. Holman, M. Bauzon, P. M. Potter, M. K. Danks, A. Fattaey, T. Dubensky, and L. Johnson A Prodrug Strategy Using ONYX-015-Based Replicating Adenoviruses to Deliver Rabbit Carboxylesterase to Tumor Cells for Conversion of CPT-11 to SN-38 Cancer Res., October 15, 2003; 63(20): 6900 - 6908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. Dodds, P. J. Tobin, C. F. Stewart, P. Cheshire, S. Hanna, P. Houghton, and L. P. Rivory The Importance of Tumor Glucuronidase in the Activation of Irinotecan in a Mouse Xenograft Model J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2002; 303(2): 649 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Raymond, V. Boige, S. Faivre, G.-J. Sanderink, O. Rixe, L. Vernillet, C. Jacques, M. Gatineau, M. Ducreux, and J.-P. Armand Dosage Adjustment and Pharmacokinetic Profile of Irinotecan in Cancer Patients With Hepatic Dysfunction J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2002; 20(21): 4303 - 4312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Leggas, C. F. Stewart, M. H. Woo, M. Fouladi, P. J. Cheshire, J. K. Peterson, H. S. Friedman, C. Billups, and P. J. Houghton Relation between Irofulven (MGI-114) Systemic Exposure and Tumor Response in Human Solid Tumor Xenografts Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2002; 8(9): 3000 - 3007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. N. Kirstein, P. J. Houghton, P. J. Cheshire, L. B. Richmond, A. K. Smith, S. K. Hanna, and C. F. Stewart Relation between 9-Aminocamptothecin Systemic Exposure and Tumor Response in Human Solid Tumor Xenografts Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2001; 7(2): 358 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. J. Houghton, C. F. Stewart, P. J. Cheshire, L. B. Richmond, M. N. Kirstein, C. A. Poquette, M. Tan, H. S. Friedman, and T. P. Brent Antitumor Activity of Temozolomide Combined with Irinotecan Is Partly Independent of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase and Mismatch Repair Phenotypes in Xenograft Models Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2000; 6(10): 4110 - 4118. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. L. Morton, M. Wierdl, L. Oliver, M. K. Ma, M. K. Danks, C. F. Stewart, J. L. Eiseman, and P. M. Potter Activation of CPT-11 in Mice: Identification and Analysis of a Highly Effective Plasma Esterase Cancer Res., August 1, 2000; 60(15): 4206 - 4210. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. H. Takimoto, G. Morrison, N. Harold, M. Quinn, B. P. Monahan, R. A. Band, J. Cottrell, A. Guemei, V. Llorens, H. Hehman, et al. Phase I and Pharmacologic Study of Irinotecan Administered as a 96-Hour Infusion Weekly to Adult Cancer Patients J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2000; 18(3): 659 - 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. L. Furman, C. F. Stewart, C. A. Poquette, C. B. Pratt, V. M. Santana, W. C. Zamboni, L. C. Bowman, M. K. Ma, F. A. Hoffer, W. H. Meyer, et al. Direct Translation of a Protracted Irinotecan Schedule From a Xenograft Model to a Phase I Trial in Children J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 1999; 17(6): 1815 - 1815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]