Clinical Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelber, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Vitetta, E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gelber, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Vitetta, E. S.

Clinical Cancer Research, Vol 4, Issue 5 1297-1304, Copyright © 1998 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

Effect of immunosuppressive agents on the immunogenicity and efficacy of an immunotoxin in mice

EE Gelber and ES Vitetta
Department of Microbiology, The Cancer Immunobiology Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-8576, USA.

Immunotoxins (ITs) are potent cytotoxic agents used in the treatment of cancer, autoimmune disease, and graft-versus-host disease. Results from clinical trials demonstrate that many IT-treated patients, especially those with an intact immune system, develop anti-IT antibodies that may prohibit repeated IT dosing. We, therefore, evaluated a panel of novel immunosuppressive (IS) agents for their ability to inhibit the antitoxin immune response in mice receiving multiple courses of a ricin A chain (RTA)-containing IT and also assessed whether this suppression would result in an increase in IT-mediated antitumor activity. The results indicate that a 3-day pretreatment, plus one additional boost 2 weeks later, of a combination of hCTLA4Ig + anti-CD40L, virtually eliminated the anti-RTA response in normal mice receiving six weekly injections of an IT. When tested in BCL1 tumor-bearing mice, the concomitant use of a combination of hCTLA4Ig + anti-CD40L and six doses of the IT resulted in a 1.5-fold increase in tumor cell killing, as compared with treatment with IT alone. We conclude that a combination of IS + IT therapy should facilitate the administration of multiple courses of IT, as well as enhance its antitumor activity.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1998 by the American Association for Cancer Research.