Clinical Cancer Research Versailles No Abst Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerrits, C. J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Verweij, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerrits, C. J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Verweij, J.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 5, 69-75, January 1999
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Trials

A Comparison of Clinical Pharmacodynamics of Different Administration Schedules of Oral Topotecan (Hycamtin)

Cees J. H. Gerrits, Jan H. M. Schellens, Howard Burris, John R. Eckardt, Andre S. T. Planting, Maria E. L. van der Burg, Gail I. Rodriguez, Walter J. Loos, Vera van Beurden, Ian Hudson, Daniel D. Von Hoff and Jaap Verweij1

Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Daniel den Hoed Kliniek) and University Hospital, 3075 EA Rotterdam, the Netherlands [C. J. H. G., J. H. M. S., A. S. T. P., M. E. L. v. d. B., W. J. L., V. v. B., J. V.]; Cancer Therapy and Research Center and the University of Texas, San Antonio, Texas 78245 [H. B., J. R. E., G. I. R., D. D. V. H.]; and SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Harlow, CM18 5AW United Kingdom and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19426 [I. H.]

Prolonged exposure to topotecan in in vitro and in vivo experiments has yielded the highest antitumor efficacy. An oral formulation of topotecan with a bioavailability of 32–44% in humans enables convenient prolonged administration. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships from four Phase I studies with different schedules of administration of oral topotecan in 99 adult patients with malignant solid tumors refractory to standard forms of chemotherapy were compared. Topotecan was administered as follows: (a) once daily (o.d.) for 5 days every 21 days (29 patients); (b) o.d. for 10 days every 21 days (19 patients); (c) twice daily (b.i.d.) for 10 days every 21 days (20 patients); and (d) b.i.d. for 21 days every 28 days (31 patients). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 55 patients using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods. Totals of 109, 48, 64, and 59 courses were given, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of granulocytopenia for the o.d. x 5-day dosage, a combination of myelosuppression and diarrhea in both of the 10-day schedules, and only diarrhea in the 21-day schedule. Pharmacokinetics revealed a substantial variation of the area under curve (AUC) of topotecan lactone in all of the dose schedules with a mean intrapatient variation of 25.4 ± 31.0% (o.d. x 5), 34.5 ± 25.0% (o.d. x 10), 96.5 ± 70.1% (b.i.d. x 10), and 59.5 ± 51.0% (b.i.d. x 21). Significant correlations were observed between myelotoxicity parameters and AUC(t) day 1 and AUC(t) per course of topotecan lactone. In all of the studies, similar sigmoidal relationships could be established between AUC(t) per course and the percentage decrease of WBCs. At maximum-tolerated dose level, no significant difference in AUC(t) per course was found [AUC(t) per course was 107.4 ± 33.7 ng·h/ml (o.d. x 5), 145.3 ± 23.8 ng·h/ml (o.d. x 10), 100.0 ± 41.5 ng·h/ml (b.i.d. x 10), and 164.9 ± 92.2 ng·h/ml (b.i.d. x 21), respectively.] For oral topotecan, the schedule rather than the AUC(t)-per-course seemed to be related to the type of toxicity. Prolonged oral administration resulted in intestinal side effects as a dose-limiting toxicity, and short-term administration resulted in granulocytopenia. On the basis of this pharmacokinetic study, no schedule preference could be expressed, but based on patient convenience, administration once daily for 5 days could be favored.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. O'Brien, J. Eckardt, and R. Ramlau
Recent Advances with Topotecan in the Treatment of Lung Cancer
Oncologist, October 1, 2007; 12(10): 1194 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
I. E.L.M. Kuppens, E. O. Witteveen, R. C. Jewell, S. A. Radema, E. M. Paul, S. G. Mangum, J. H. Beijnen, E. E. Voest, and J. H.M. Schellens
A Phase I, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Cohort, Dose-Finding Study of Elacridar (GF120918) and Oral Topotecan in Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 13(11): 3276 - 3285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. R. Eckardt, J. von Pawel, J.-L. Pujol, Z. Papai, E. Quoix, A. Ardizzoni, R. Poulin, A. J. Preston, G. Dane, and G. Ross
Phase III Study of Oral Compared With Intravenous Topotecan As Second-Line Therapy in Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2007; 25(15): 2086 - 2092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
L. Markasz, G. Stuber, B. Vanherberghen, E. Flaberg, E. Olah, E. Carbone, S. Eksborg, E. Klein, H. Skribek, and L. Szekely
Effect of frequently used chemotherapeutic drugs on the cytotoxic activity of human natural killer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2007; 6(2): 644 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. S. Kretschmar, M. Kletzel, K. Murray, P. Thorner, V. Joshi, R. Marcus, E. I. Smith, W. B. London, and R. Castleberry
Response to Paclitaxel, Topotecan, and Topotecan-Cyclophosphamide in Children With Untreated Disseminated Neuroblastoma Treated in an Upfront Phase II Investigational Window: A Pediatric Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2004; 22(20): 4119 - 4126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
A. Chatterjee, R. Digumarti, R. N. V. S. Mamidi, K. Katneni, V. V. Upreti, A. Surath, M. L. Srinivas, S. Uppalapati, S. Jiwatani, S. Subramaniam, et al.
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of an Orally Active Novel Camptothecin Analog, DRF-1042, in Refractory Cancer Patients in a Phase I Dose Escalation Study
J. Clin. Pharmacol., July 1, 2004; 44(7): 723 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
T. J. Herzog
Update on the Role of Topotecan in the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
Oncologist, October 1, 2002; 7(90005): 3 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Hudes
Boosting Bioavailability of Topotecan: What Do We Gain?
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2002; 20(13): 2918 - 2919.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. L. Furman, C. F. Stewart, M. Kirstein, J. L. Kepner, M. L. Bernstein, F. Kung, T. J. Vietti, C. P. Steuber, D. L. Becton, S. Baruchel, et al.
Protracted Intermittent Schedule of Topotecan in Children With Refractory Acute Leukemia: A Pediatric Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2002; 20(6): 1617 - 1624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Garcia-Carbonero and J. G. Supko
Current Perspectives on the Clinical Experience, Pharmacology, and Continued Development of the Camptothecins
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2002; 8(3): 641 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Montazeri, S. Culine, B. Laguerre, F. Pinguet, F. Lokiec, N. Albin, A. Goupil, R. Deporte-Fety, R. Bugat, P. Canal, et al.
Individual Adaptive Dosing of Topotecan in Ovarian Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2002; 8(2): 394 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Guichard, A. Montazeri, E. Chatelut, I. Hennebelle, R. Bugat, and P. Canal
Schedule-dependent Activity of Topotecan in OVCAR-3 Ovarian Carcinoma Xenograft: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2001; 7(10): 3222 - 3228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Blaney, S. L. Berg, C. Pratt, S. Weitman, J. Sullivan, L. Luchtman-Jones, and M. Bernstein
A Phase I Study of Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients: A Pediatric Oncology Group Study
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2001; 7(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
W. J. Loos, H. Gelderblom, A. Sparreboom, J. Verweij, and M. J. A. de Jonge
Inter- and Intrapatient Variability in Oral Topotecan Pharmacokinetics: Implications for Body-Surface Area Dosage Regimens
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2000; 6(7): 2685 - 2689.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. C. White, S. Cheeseman, N. Thatcher, H. Anderson, B. Carrington, S. Hearn, G. Ross, and M. Ranson
Phase II Study of Oral Topotecan in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2000; 6(3): 868 - 873.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. M.M. Herben, J. H.M. Schellens, M. Swart, G. Gruia, L. Vernillet, J. H. Beijnen, and W. W. ten Bokkel Huinink
Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Irinotecan Administered as a Low-Dose, Continuous Intravenous Infusion Over 14 Days in Patients With Malignant Solid Tumors
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 1999; 17(6): 1897 - 1897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. O'Reilly
Topotecan: What Dose, What Schedule, What Route?
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 1999; 5(1): 3 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for Cancer Research.