This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Crosier, M. Articles by Westley, B. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Crosier, M. Articles by Westley, B. R.

Differences in Ki67 and c-erbB2 Expression between Screen-detected and True Interval Breast Cancers

Department of Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP [M. C., D. S., F. E. B. M., B. R. W.], and Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE [R. G. W., C. D. M. G.], United Kingdom

Breast cancer screening facilitates the early detection of breast cancer, although a significant number of tumors still arise in the interval between screening. The objective of this study was to measure the expression of five markers of proven prognostic significance in symptomatic breast cancer (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53, Ki67, and c-erbB2) in screen-detected and interval breast cancers to identify biological markers that may be associated with the emergence of symptomatic breast cancer in the screening interval. The expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53, Ki67, and c-erbB2 was assessed in a series of 51 true interval and 84 screened-detected invasive tumors by immunohistochemistry. Interval cancers tended to be of higher histological grade and were of larger pathological size than screen-detected cancers. Expression of estrogen receptor was 1.7-fold lower (P < 0.001), whereas expression of p53 was 2.5-fold (P < 0.01), Ki67 2.4-fold (P < 0.001), and c-erbB2 3.6-fold higher (P < 0.01) in true interval cancers compared with screen-detected invasive cancers. There was no significant difference in progesterone receptor expression. The most important differences identified by multiple logistic regression analysis were in the expression of Ki67 and c-erbB2. The differences in the expression of these markers were more important than clinical features such as pathological grade and size. Using the logistic regression model, 83% of the tumors analyzed in this study could be correctly assigned as interval or screen-detected tumors on the basis of Ki67 and c-erbB2 expression. The importance of high expression of Ki67 in interval cancers compared with screen-detected cancers suggests that tumors may become symptomatic in the screening interval as a result of increased levels of cell proliferation. The inclusion of c-erbB2 in the regression equation suggests that this growth factor receptor may play a significant role in stimulating the rapid growth of interval cancers.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Sihto, J. Lundin, T. Lehtimaki, M. Sarlomo-Rikala, R. Butzow, K. Holli, L. Sailas, V. Kataja, M. Lundin, T. Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, et al. Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancers Detected in Mammography Screening and Outside of Screening Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 14(13): 4103 - 4110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Collett, G. E. Eide, J. Arnes, I. M. Stefansson, J. Eide, A. Braaten, T. Aas, A. P. Otte, and L. A. Akslen Expression of Enhancer of Zeste Homologue 2 Is Significantly Associated with Increased Tumor Cell Proliferation and Is a Marker of Aggressive Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 12(4): 1168 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Collett, I. M. Stefansson, J. Eide, A. Braaten, H. Wang, G. E. Eide, S. O. Thoresen, W. D. Foulkes, and L. A. Akslen A Basal Epithelial Phenotype Is More Frequent in Interval Breast Cancers Compared with Screen Detected Tumors Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1108 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Elmore, K. Armstrong, C. D. Lehman, and S. W. Fletcher Screening for Breast Cancer JAMA, March 9, 2005; 293(10): 1245 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. M. Buist, P. L. Porter, C. Lehman, S. H. Taplin, and E. White Factors Contributing to Mammography Failure in Women Aged 40-49 Years J Natl Cancer Inst, October 6, 2004; 96(19): 1432 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Joensuu, T. Lehtimaki, K. Holli, L. Elomaa, T. Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, V. Kataja, A. Anttila, M. Lundin, J. Isola, and J. Lundin Risk for Distant Recurrence of Breast Cancer Detected by Mammography Screening or Other Methods JAMA, September 1, 2004; 292(9): 1064 - 1073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Skinner, H. Silberman, R. Sposto, and M. J. Silverstein Palpable Breast Cancers Are Inherently Different From Nonpalpable Breast Cancers Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2001; 8(9): 705 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Crosier, D. Scott, R. G. Wilson, C. D. M. Griffiths, F. E. B. May, and B. R. Westley High Expression of the Trefoil Protein TFF1 in Interval Breast Cancers Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2001; 159(1): 215 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]