Clinical Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bunn, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bunn, P. A., Jr.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 5, 3419-3424, November 1999
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Trials

A Phase I Study of Paclitaxel, Etoposide, and Cisplatin in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer1

Karen Kelly2, Zhaoxing Pan, Marie E. Wood, James Murphy and Paul A. Bunn, Jr.

Division of Medical Oncology and the Lung Cancer Program [K. K., M. E. W., P. A. B.] and Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics [Z. P., J. M.], University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, Colorado 80262

This Phase I study was designed to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel with standard doses of cisplatin and etoposide for patients with untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Secondary objectives were to determine the toxicities, response rate, response duration, and overall survival in this cohort. Twenty-eight SCLC patients were enrolled into four dose levels. All patients received a fixed dose of cisplatin at 80 mg/m2, i.v., day 1. The first group received etoposide 50 mg/m2, i.v. day 1 and 100 mg/m2 p.o., days 2–3, whereas all subsequent groups received etoposide 80 mg/m2, i.v., day 1 and 160 mg/m2, p.o., days 2–3. The paclitaxel starting dose was 135 mg/m2, i.v., over a 3-h period and was escalated to 175 and 200 mg/m2. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was not given prophylactically but was allowed in subsequent cycles according to the American Society of Clinical Oncologists guidelines. All 28 SCLC patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 23 patients were evaluable for response. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, with grade 4 neutropenia occurring in 23 of 28 patients (82%), but febrile neutropenia was uncommon and developed in 4 patients (14%). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia and anemia were rare, occurring as isolated events in one patient each. Dose-limiting peripheral neuropathy was observed at a paclitaxel dose of 200 mg/m2. Grade 4 nausea/vomiting and diarrhea were also noted at this dose level. Five patients had complete responses (22%), and 14 patients had partial responses (61%). The overall response rate was 83% with a median time to progression of 7.5 months, a median survival of 10 months, and a 1-year survival rate of 39%. This three-drug combination of paclitaxel with cisplatin and etoposide is active with acceptable toxicity. Neurotoxicity was dose limiting at 200 mg/m2 of paclitaxel. Neutropenia was frequent but not associated with significant morbidity. The recommended doses for future clinical trials are 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel, i.v., over a 3-h period on day 1 with 80 mg/m2 cisplatin, i.v., on day 1 and 80 mg/m2 etoposide, i.v., on day 1 and 160 mg/m2 p.o. on days 2 and 3 with growth factor support. The Southwestern Oncology Group has instituted a Phase II study with this dose schedule.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
G. R. Simon and A. Turrisi
Management of Small Cell Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition)
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 324S - 339S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. B. Niell, J. E. Herndon II, A. A. Miller, D. M. Watson, A. B. Sandler, K. Kelly, R. S. Marks, M. C. Perry, R. H. Ansari, G. Otterson, et al.
Randomized Phase III Intergroup Trial of Etoposide and Cisplatin With or Without Paclitaxel and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9732
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2005; 23(16): 3752 - 3759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. Laskin, A. Sandler, and D. H. Johnson
An Advance in Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treatment--More or Less
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 6, 2003; 95(15): 1099 - 1101.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
K. Osterlind
Chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2001; 18(6): 1026 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Kelly, L. Lovato, P. A. Bunn Jr., R. B. Livingston, J. Zangmeister, S. A. Taylor, D. Roychowdhury, J. J. Crowley, and D. R. Gandara
Cisplatin, Etoposide, and Paclitaxel with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Untreated Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Trial of the Southwest Oncology Group
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 7(8): 2325 - 2329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for Cancer Research.