
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Departments of Hematology-Oncology [J. T.], Biostatistics and Epidemiology [O. G., C. A. P.], Molecular Pharmacology [P. J. C., L. B. R., P. J. H.], and Pharmaceutical Sciences [M. M., C. F. S.], St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105-2794, and Department of Pediatrics, Princess Beatrix Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands 9700RB [S. S. N. d. G.]
Topotecan and vincristine were evaluated alone or in combination against 13 independent xenografts and 1 vincristine-resistant derivative, representing childhood neuroblastoma (n = 6), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 5), or brain tumors (n = 3). Topotecan was given by i.v. bolus on a schedule found previously to be optimal. Drug was administered daily for 5 days on 2 consecutive weeks with cycles repeated every 21 days over a period of 8 weeks. Doses of topotecan ranged from 0.16 to 1.5 mg/kg to simulate clinically achievable topotecan lactone plasma systemic exposures. Vincristine was administered i.v. every 7 days at a fixed dose of 1 mg/kg. Given as a single agent, vincristine induced complete responses (CRs) in all mice bearing two rhabdomyosarcomas (Rh28 and Rh30) and some CRs in Rh12-bearing mice (57%) but relatively few CRs (<29%) in other tumors. As a single agent, topotecan induced CR in a low proportion of tumor lines. A dose-response model with a logit link function was used to investigate whether the combination of topotecan and vincristine resulted in greater than expected responses compared with the activity of the agents when administered alone. Only CR was used to evaluate tumor responses. The combination resulted in significantly greater than expected CRs than individual agents in nine tumor lines (four neuroblastoma, three brain tumors, and two rhabdomyosarcomas). Similar event-free (failure) distributions were shown in SJ-GBM2 glioblastoma xenografts, whether vincristine was administered on day 1 or day 5 of each topotecan course. To determine whether the increased antitumor activity with the combination was attributable to a change in drug disposition, extensive pharmacokinetic studies were performed. However, little or no interaction between these two agents was determined. Toxicity of the combination was marked by prolonged thrombocytopenia and decreased hemoglobin. However, approximately 75 and 80% of the maximum tolerated dose of each single agent, topotecan (1.5 mg/kg) or vincristine (1 mg/kg), could be given in combination, resulting in a combination toxicity index of
1.5. These results show that the therapeutic effect of combining topotecan with vincristine was greater than additive in most tumor models of childhood solid tumors, and toxicity data suggest that this can be administered to mice with only moderate reduction in the dose levels for each agent.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. S. Pappo, E. Lyden, P. Breitfeld, S. S. Donaldson, E. Wiener, D. Parham, K. R. Crews, P. Houghton, and W. H. Meyer Two Consecutive Phase II Window Trials of Irinotecan Alone or in Combination With Vincristine for the Treatment of Metastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma: The Children's Oncology Group J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 25(4): 362 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Saab, J. L. Bills, A. P. Miceli, C. M. Anderson, J. D. Khoury, D. W. Fry, F. Navid, P. J. Houghton, and S. X. Skapek Pharmacologic inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 activity arrests proliferation in myoblasts and rhabdomyosarcoma-derived cells Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2006; 5(5): 1299 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. McCluskey, M. Boyd, S. C. Ross, E. Cosimo, A. M. Clark, W. J. Angerson, M. N. Gaze, and R. J. Mairs [131I]meta-Iodobenzylguanidine and Topotecan Combination Treatment of Tumors Expressing the Noradrenaline Transporter Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 11(21): 7929 - 7937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Laurie, J. K. Gray, J. Zhang, M. Leggas, M. Relling, M. Egorin, C. Stewart, and M. A. Dyer Topotecan Combination Chemotherapy in Two New Rodent Models of Retinoblastoma Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 11(20): 7569 - 7578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Peterson, C. Tucker, E. Favours, P. J. Cheshire, J. Creech, C. A. Billups, R. Smykla, F. Y.F. Lee, and P. J. Houghton In vivo Evaluation of Ixabepilone (BMS247550), A Novel Epothilone B Derivative, against Pediatric Cancer Models Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 6950 - 6958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Kushner, K. Kramer, S. Modak, and N.-K. V. Cheung Camptothecin Analogs (Irinotecan or Topotecan) plus High-Dose Cyclophosphamide as Preparative Regimens for Antibody-Based Immunotherapy in Resistant Neuroblastoma Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2004; 10(1): 84 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Houghton, P. C. Adamson, S. Blaney, H. A. Fine, R. Gorlick, M. Haber, L. Helman, S. Hirschfeld, M. G. Hollingshead, M. A. Israel, et al. Testing of New Agents in Childhood Cancer Preclinical Models: Meeting Summary Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2002; 8(12): 3646 - 3657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Leggas, C. F. Stewart, M. H. Woo, M. Fouladi, P. J. Cheshire, J. K. Peterson, H. S. Friedman, C. Billups, and P. J. Houghton Relation between Irofulven (MGI-114) Systemic Exposure and Tumor Response in Human Solid Tumor Xenografts Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2002; 8(9): 3000 - 3007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Pappo, E. Lyden, J. Breneman, E. Wiener, L. Teot, J. Meza, W. Crist, and T. Vietti Up-Front Window Trial of Topotecan in Previously Untreated Children and Adolescents With Metastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma: An Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2001; 19(1): 213 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Houghton, C. F. Stewart, P. J. Cheshire, L. B. Richmond, M. N. Kirstein, C. A. Poquette, M. Tan, H. S. Friedman, and T. P. Brent Antitumor Activity of Temozolomide Combined with Irinotecan Is Partly Independent of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase and Mismatch Repair Phenotypes in Xenograft Models Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2000; 6(10): 4110 - 4118. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |