Clinical Cancer Research Prevention Award Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, H.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 5, 4126-4132, December 1999
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

Evaluation of Four Antibodies in Detecting p53 Protein for Predicting Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma1

Hong Zhang2

Division of Cell Biology, Department of Biomedicine and Surgery, Linköping University, S-581 85 Linköping, Sweden

To evaluate both the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of p53 protein, the expression of p53 protein was immunohistochemically examined by use of CM1, PAb1801, DO7, and DO1 antibodies on paraffin-embedded colorectal adenocarcinomas from 293 patients. Overexpression of the p53 protein was present in 49% of the samples studied with CM1, 18% with PAb1801, 30% with DO7, and 44% with DO7. The p53 overexpression, as detected by any of the antibodies, tended to associate with distal colorectal, nonmucinous, DNA nondiploid, and higher proliferatively active tumors (P < 0.05) but was irrespective of the patient’s gender, age, tumor growth pattern, or Dukes’ stage (P >= 0.05). The p53 protein that was detected by CM1 in either the nucleus (P = 0.007) or the cytoplasm (P = 0.0005) was an independent prognostic indicator. DO1 staining correlated with poor prognosis in the patients with Dukes’ B tumor (P = 0.02). However, neither PAb1801 nor DO7 staining could predict prognosis (P > 0.05). p53-positive staining by any of the antibodies predicted significantly poor prognosis compared with p53-negative reactivity (P = 0.007). These results suggest that there was essentially no difference in the significance of p53 overexpression as detected by any of the four antibodies with regard to clinicopathological variables. However, CM1 was the best antibody for predicting prognosis in this series of colorectal cancer patients.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for Cancer Research.