This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Isola, J. Articles by Waldman, F. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Isola, J. Articles by Waldman, F. M.

Genetic Alterations in ERBB2-amplified Breast Carcinomas^{1 ,,2}

Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, University and University Hospital of Tampere, Tampere, Finland 33101 [J. I.], and Cancer Center [L. C., S. D., K. M., K. C.] and Departments of Laboratory Medicine [F. M. W.] and Pathology [B. M. L.], University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0808

Amplification of the ERBB2 oncogene has recently received attention as a target for antibody-based therapies and as a predictor of response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Modification of treatment strategies based on ERBB2 status has led to further interest in the genetic alterations that accompany ERBB2 gene amplification or overexpression. In this study, chromosome alterations that are associated with ERBB2 amplification were defined by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Additionally, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to validate gene amplification, and protein expression was detected immunohistochemically. ERBB2-amplified tumors as detected by FISH, immunohistochemistry (IHC), or CGH had twice as many CGH-defined chromosomal alterations (means of 11.8, 11.0, and 12.7, respectively) as the nonamplified tumors (means of 6.8, 7.0, and 5.6, respectively). ERBB2 positivity correlated with the total number of genetic events. A wide spectrum of copy number gains and losses was seen by CGH in all of the tumors. An increased number of losses of 18q and gains of 20q was found in ERBB2-positive tumors. Other common aberrations for all of the tumors were copy number gains of 1q (58%), 8q (52%), 20q (30%), and losses of 18q (39%), 13q (39%), and 3p (33%). A high degree of concordance was observed among the three methods in 33 primary breast cancers. The concurrence for ERBB2 detection between FISH and IHC was 90%, between FISH and CGH was 82%, and between IHC and CGH was 84%. This study shows that breast tumors showing erbB2 overexpression or gene amplification are genetically distinct from erbB2-negative tumors. These differences may relate to the mechanisms underlying altered response to adjuvant therapies and may define the responsiveness to erbB2-directed immunotherapy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Rizki, V. M. Weaver, S.-Y. Lee, G. I. Rozenberg, K. Chin, C. A. Myers, J. L. Bascom, J. D. Mott, J. R. Semeiks, L. R. Grate, et al. A Human Breast Cell Model of Preinvasive to Invasive Transition Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 68(5): 1378 - 1387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Bussey, K. Chin, S. Lababidi, M. Reimers, W. C. Reinhold, W.-L. Kuo, F. Gwadry, Ajay, H. Kouros-Mehr, J. Fridlyand, et al. Integrating data on DNA copy number with gene expression levels and drug sensitivities in the NCI-60 cell line panel. Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2006; 5(4): 853 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Aulmann, N Adler, J Rom, B Helmchen, P Schirmacher, and H P Sinn c-myc Amplifications in primary breast carcinomas and their local recurrences J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2006; 59(4): 424 - 4248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Zhang, L. K. Tai, L. L. Wong, L.-L. Chiu, S. K. Sethi, and E. S. C. Koay Proteomic Study Reveals That Proteins Involved in Metabolic and Detoxification Pathways Are Highly Expressed in HER-2/neu-positive Breast Cancer Mol. Cell. Proteomics, November 1, 2005; 4(11): 1686 - 1696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Li-Ning-T, R. Ronchetti, C. Torres-Cabala, and M. J. Merino Role of Chromogenic in Situ Hybridization (CISHTM) in the Evaluation of HER2 Status in Breast Carcinoma: Comparison with Immunohistochemistry and Fish International Journal of Surgical Pathology, October 1, 2005; 13(4): 343 - 351. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. M. Sinilnikova, S. M. Ginolhac, C. Magnard, M. Leone, O. Anczukow, D. Hughes, K. Moreau, D. Thompson, C. Coutanson, J. Hall, et al. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase {alpha} gene and breast cancer susceptibility Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2004; 25(12): 2417 - 2424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Hwang, S. DeVries, K. L. Chew, D. H. Moore II, K. Kerlikowske, A. Thor, B.-M. Ljung, and F. M. Waldman Patterns of Chromosomal Alterations in Breast Ductal Carcinoma In situ Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 10(15): 5160 - 5167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Jeruss, N. X. Liu, Y. Chung, G. Magrane, F. Waldman, S. Edgerton, X. Yang, and A. D. Thor Characterization and chromosomal instability of novel derived cell lines from a wt-erbB-2 transgenic mouse model Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2003; 24(4): 659 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Kumar-Sinha, K. W. Ignatoski, M. E. Lippman, S. P. Ethier, and A. M. Chinnaiyan Transcriptome Analysis of HER2 Reveals a Molecular Connection to Fatty Acid Synthesis Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 63(1): 132 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Climent, J. A. Martinez-Climent, D. Blesa, M. J. Garcia-Barchino, R. Saez, D. Sanchez-Izquierdo, P. Azagra, A. Lluch, and J. Garcia-Conde Genomic Loss of 18p Predicts an Adverse Clinical Outcome in Patients with High-Risk Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2002; 8(12): 3863 - 3869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. P. Risbridger, J. F. Schmitt, and D. M. Robertson Activins and Inhibins in Endocrine and Other Tumors Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2001; 22(6): 836 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S A J Vaziri, R R Tubbs, G Darlington, and G Casey Absence of CCND1 gene amplification in breast tumours of BRCA1 mutation carriers Mol. Pathol., August 1, 2001; 54(4): 259 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]