Clinical Cancer Research Meeting Calendar Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wadhwa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Thorpe, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wadhwa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Thorpe, R.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 5, 1353-1361, June 1999
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Trials

Immunogenicity of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) Products in Patients Undergoing Combination Therapy with GM-CSF1

Meenu Wadhwa2, Anna-Lena Hjelm Skog, Chris Bird, Peter Ragnhammar, Maria Lilljefors, Rose Gaines-Das, Hakan Mellstedt and Robin Thorpe

Division of Immunobiology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Hertfordshire EN6 3QG, United Kingdom [M. W., C. B., R. G-D., R. T.], and Department of Oncology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm 17176, Sweden [A-L. H. S., P. R., M. L., H. M.]

In this study, we have assessed the development of neutralizing and nonneutralizing granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) antibodies in two groups of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma receiving two different GM-CSF products. Three clinical trials were carried out, and a combination of GM-CSF and a colon carcinoma-reactive antibody was used in the absence of any concomitant chemotherapy. Two different GM-CSF products, both rDNA-derived and produced in Escherichia coli, were used. Patients in Trial 1 received product X, and those in Trials 2 and 3 received product Y. Patients in Trial 2 also received interleukin 2 in an attempt to potentiate immune responses. After the first cycle of treatment, no GM-CSF antibodies were detected, but on subsequent therapy, 28 of the 38 patients tested receiving product Y (Trials 2 and 3) developed antibodies that bound to the GM-CSF product used for therapy. However, none of the patients developed antibodies that neutralized the biological activity of GM-CSF, as assessed using an in vitro bioassay. Furthermore, there was no in vivo impairment in GM-CSF-induced expansion of leukocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils in the patients. In contrast, 19 of the 20 patients given product X (Trial 1) developed GM-CSF binding antibodies, and 9 of these patients were shown to develop antibodies that neutralized the biological activity of GM-CSF. The presence of the latter was associated with a significant reduction in GM-CSF-induced expansion of leukocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils in patients. Therefore, product X appears to be more immunogenic than product Y. Immunochemical characterization confirmed that the specificity of the antibody responses varied depending on the product used for therapy. Whereas sera from Trial 1 patients treated with product X showed the presence of antibodies with strong recognition of GM-CSF proteins, sera from patients treated with product Y showed varied recognition of GM-CSF ranging from fairly strong to very weak but bound predominantly to two E. coli-derived, non-GM-CSF-related proteins of Mr ~20,000 and Mr ~30,000. Therefore, in sera from patients receiving product Y, the antibody specificity appeared to be directed not only against GM-CSF but also against non-product-related host cell contaminants. This study shows that GM-CSF products used for therapy are potentially immunogenic and generate antibodies to GM-CSF and/or other non-product-related contaminants. However, only antibodies that neutralize the biological activity of GM-CSF compromise therapeutic efficacy of the cytokine.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CVIHome page
R. Thorpe and S. J Swanson
Current Methods for Detecting Antibodies against Erythropoietin and Other Recombinant Proteins
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., January 1, 2005; 12(1): 28 - 39.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. F. Seymour and J. J. Presneill
Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis: Progress in the First 44 Years
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2002; 166(2): 215 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A.-L. H. Skog, M. Wadhwa, M. Hassan, B. Gharizadeh, C. Bird, P. Ragnhammar, R. Thorpe, and H. Mellstedt
Alteration of Interleukin 2 (IL-2) Pharmacokinetics and Function by IL-2 Antibodies Induced after Treatment of Colorectal Carcinoma Patients with a Combination of Monoclonal Antibody 17-1A, Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, and IL-2
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2001; 7(5): 1163 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for Cancer Research.