
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Trials |
Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Daniel den Hoed Kliniek) and University Hospital Rotterdam, 3075 EA Rotterdam, the Netherlands [M. J. A. d. J., J. V., A. S. T. P., M. E. L. v. d. B., G. S., M. M. d. B-D., P. d. B., E. B., A. S.], and Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, 92165 Antony Cedex, France [L. V.]
In this study, 11 patients with solid tumors were randomized to receive irinotecan (CPT-11; 200 mg/m2) as a 90-min i.v. infusion, immediately followed by cisplatin (CDDP; 80 mg/m2) as a 3-h i.v. infusion in the first course and the reversed sequence in the second course or vice versa. No significant differences in any toxicity were observed between the treatment schedules (decrease in absolute neutrophil count, 74.7 ± 18.3 versus 80.3 ± 18.0%; P = 0.41). CPT-11 lactone clearance was similar to single agent data and not significantly different between study courses (60.4 ± 17.1 versus 65.5 ± 16.3 liter/h/m2; P = 0.66). The kinetic profiles of the major CPT-11 metabolites SN-38, SN-38 glucuronide, 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecine (APC), and 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(1-piperidino)-1-amino]carbonyloxycamptothecine (NPC) were also sequence independent (P
0.20). In addition, CPT-11 had no influence on the clearance of nonprotein-bound CDDP (40.8 ± 16.7 versus 50.3 ± 18.6 liter/h/m2; P = 0.08) and the platinum DNA-adduct formation in peripheral leukocytes in either sequence (1.94 ± 2.20 versus 2.42 ± 1.62 pg Pt/µg DNA; P = 0.41). These data indicate that the toxicity of the combination CPT-11 and CDDP is schedule independent and that there is no mutual pharmacokinetic interaction.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. H.J. Mathijssen, J. Verweij, M. J.A. de Jonge, K. Nooter, G. Stoter, and A. Sparreboom Impact of Body-Size Measures on Irinotecan Clearance: Alternative Dosing Recommendations J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2002; 20(1): 81 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kozuch, M. L. Grossbard, A. Barzdins, M. Araneo, A. Robin, D. Frager, P. Homel, J. Marino, P. DeGregorio, and H.W. Bruckner Irinotecan Combined with Gemcitabine, 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Cisplatin (G-FLIP) is an Effective and Noncrossresistant Treatment for Chemotherapy Refractory Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Oncologist, December 1, 2001; 6(6): 488 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. E. de Jongh, J. Verweij, W. J. Loos, R. de Wit, M. J.A. de Jonge, A. S.T. Planting, K. Nooter, G. Stoter, and A. Sparreboom Body-Surface Area-Based Dosing Does Not Increase Accuracy of Predicting Cisplatin Exposure J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2001; 19(17): 3733 - 3739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. J. Mathijssen, R. J. van Alphen, J. Verweij, W. J. Loos, K. Nooter, G. Stoter, and A. Sparreboom Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism of Irinotecan (CPT-11) Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 7(8): 2182 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Rothenberg Irinotecan (CPT-11): Recent Developments and Future Directions-Colorectal Cancer and Beyond Oncologist, February 1, 2001; 6(1): 66 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |