Clinical Cancer Research Versailles No Abst Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vollmer, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Montana, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vollmer, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Montana, G. S.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 5, 2476-2484, September 1999
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

Predicting Tumor Failure in Prostate Carcinoma after Definitive Radiation Therapy: Limitations of Models Based on Prostate-specific Antigen, Clinical Stage, and Gleason Score

Robin T. Vollmer1 and Gustavo S. Montana

Laboratory Medicine [R. T. V.] and Radiation Therapy [G. S. M.], Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705; Departments of Pathology [R. T. V.] and Radiation Oncology [G. S. M.], Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705; and Moore Regional Medical Center, Pinehurst, North Carolina 28374 [G. S. M.]

In this report, we use new patient data to test three popular models developed to predict the outcome of definitive radiation therapy. The data come from 240 men with localized prostate cancer and who were treated with definitive radiation therapy at a community hospital. All three models tested were based on the three commonly available variables of pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and tumor stage, and we used the Cox proportional hazards model and the logistic regression model to relate these variables to outcome. We discovered that in our data, the optimal way to use pretreatment PSA was as natural log(PSA), the optimal way to use T stage was in three categories: T1 and T2, T3, and T4, and that the optimal use of Gleason score was as <7 versus >=7. Nevertheless, models confined to the optimal use of these three variables leave much uncertainty about important outcomes, such as the probability of relapse within 5 years.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. T. Vollmer, P. W. Kantoff, N. A. Dawson, and N. J. Vogelzang
Importance of Serum Hemoglobin in Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2002; 8(4): 1049 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. T. Vollmer and G. S. Montana
The Dynamics of Prostate-specific Antigen after Definitive Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 1999; 5(12): 4119 - 4125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for Cancer Research.