Clinical Cancer Research Meeting Calendar Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salvesen, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Akslen, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salvesen, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Akslen, L. A.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 6, 153-159, January 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

Loss of Nuclear p16 Protein Expression Is Not Associated with Promoter Methylation but Defines a Subgroup of Aggressive Endometrial Carcinomas with Poor Prognosis1

Helga B. Salvesen2, Soma Das and Lars A. Akslen

Department of Pathology, The Gade Institute [H. B. S., L. A. A.] and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics [H. B. S.], Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway, and Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 [H. B. S., S. D.]

The p16INK4aa (CDKN2) tumor suppressor gene is altered in several tumor types, but the frequency and mechanism of inactivation are largely unknown for endometrial carcinomas. We therefore wanted to assess the pattern and prognostic impact of p16 protein expression and promoter region methylation in a population-based series of 316 endometrial carcinoma patients with long-term and complete follow-up. Nuclear staining of p16 protein was related to clinicopathological variables, tumor markers, patient survival, and the presence of promoter region methylation. Absent/minimal nuclear staining for p16 protein was found in 14% of the tumors. Methylation of the p16 promoter region was found in only one tumor (0.7%) in a subset of 138 cases studied. This tumor lacked nuclear p16 protein expression as well. Loss of nuclear p16 staining was significantly associated with increased age, high FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage, serous papillary or clear cell histological types, high histological grade, aneuploidy, low estradiol and progesterone receptor concentrations, high expression of Ki-67, high intratumor microvessel density, and strong nuclear p53 protein expression. The 5-year survival was 47% for patients with absent/minimal nuclear p16 expression (n = 39) compared with 81% for patients with moderate/high nuclear p16 expression (n = 247; P < 0.0001). In Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, nuclear p16 expression showed an independent prognostic impact in addition to FIGO stage, age, Ki-67 expression, and microvessel density, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.3–6.5). The other variables lost their prognostic impact when nuclear p16 staining was added to the Cox model. In conclusion, loss of nuclear p16 protein expression was associated with aggressive endometrial carcinomas and high proliferative activity (Ki-67) and was found to represent a strong and independent prognostic indicator. Methylation of the promoter region seems to be an uncommon mechanism of p16 inactivation in endometrial carcinoma.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
E. Samuelson, C. Hedberg, S. Nilsson, and A. Behboudi
Molecular classification of spontaneous endometrial adenocarcinomas in BDII rats
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2009; 16(1): 99 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
N Horree, P J van Diest, P van der Groep, D M D S Sie-Go, and A P M Heintz
Progressive derailment of cell cycle regulators in endometrial carcinogenesis
J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2008; 61(1): 36 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
H.-Y. Huang, W.-W. Huang, C.-N. Lin, H.-L. Eng, S.-H. Li, C.-F. Li, D. Lu, S.-C. Yu, and C.-Y. Hsiung
Immunohistochemical Expression of p16INK4A, Ki-67, and Mcm2 Proteins in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Prognostic Implications and Correlations with Risk Stratification of NIH Consensus Criteria
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 13(12): 1633 - 1644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Furlan, I. Carnevali, B. Marcomini, R. Cerutti, E. Dainese, C. Capella, and C. Riva
The High Frequency of De novo Promoter Methylation in Synchronous Primary Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas.
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 12(11): 3329 - 3336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. M. Bachmann, O. J. Halvorsen, K. Collett, I. M. Stefansson, O. Straume, S. A. Haukaas, H. B. Salvesen, A. P. Otte, and L. A. Akslen
EZH2 Expression Is Associated With High Proliferation Rate and Aggressive Tumor Subgroups in Cutaneous Melanoma and Cancers of the Endometrium, Prostate, and Breast
J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2006; 24(2): 268 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. K. Mell, J. J. Meyer, M. Tretiakova, A. Khramtsov, C. Gong, S. D. Yamada, A. G. Montag, and A. J. Mundt
Prognostic Significance of E-Cadherin Protein Expression in Pathological Stage I-III Endometrial Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2004; 10(16): 5546 - 5553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. M. Stefansson, H. B. Salvesen, and L. A. Akslen
Prognostic Impact of Alterations in P-Cadherin Expression and Related Cell Adhesion Markers in Endometrial Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2004; 22(7): 1242 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. P.A. Baak, W. Snijders, B. van Diermen, P. J. van Diest, F. W. Diepenhorst, and J. Benraadt
Prospective Multicenter Validation Confirms the Prognostic Superiority of the Endometrial Carcinoma Prognostic Index in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage 1 and 2 Endometrial Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., November 15, 2003; 21(22): 4214 - 4221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. P. Whitcomb, D. G. Mutch, T. J. Herzog, J. S. Rader, R. K. Gibb, and P. J. Goodfellow
Frequent HOXA11 and THBS2 Promoter Methylation, and a Methylator Phenotype in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 9(6): 2277 - 2287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
I. Stefansson, L. A. Akslen, N. MacDonald, A. Ryan, S. Das, I. J. Jacobs, and H. B. Salvesen
Loss of hMSH2 and hMSH6 Expression Is Frequent in Sporadic Endometrial Carcinomas with Microsatellite Instability: A Population-based Study
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2002; 8(1): 138 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. R. Navari, P. Y. Roland, P. Keh, H. B. Salvesen, L. A. Akslen, O. E. Iversen, S. Das, R. Kothari, S. Howey, and B. Phillips
Loss of Estrogen Receptor (ER) Expression in Endometrial Tumors Is Not Associated with de Novo Methylation of the 5' End of the ER Gene
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2000; 6(10): 4026 - 4032.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. B. Salvesen, N. MacDonald, A. Ryan, O. E. Iversen, I. J. Jacobs, L. A. Akslen, and S. Das
Methylation of hMLH1 in a Population-based Series of Endometrial Carcinomas
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2000; 6(9): 3607 - 3613.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2000 by the American Association for Cancer Research.