Clinical Cancer Research  Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dees, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Donehower, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dees, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Donehower, R. C.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 6, 3885-3894, October 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Trials

A Phase I and Pharmacologic Evaluation of the DNA Intercalator CI-958 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors1

E. Claire Dees, Lloyd R. Whitfield, William R. Grove, Sue Rummel, Louise B. Grochow and Ross C. Donehower2

Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore Maryland 21287 [E. C. D., L. B. G., R. C. D.], and Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research Division of Warner-Lambert Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 [L. R. W., W. R. G., S. R.]

5-[(2-Aminoethyl)amino]-2-[2-(diethylamino)ethyl]-2H- [1]benzothiopyrano[4,3,2-cd]-indazol-8-ol trihydrochloride (CI-958) is the most active member of a new class of DNA intercalating compounds, the benzothiopyranoindazoles. Because of its broad spectrum and high degree of activity as well as a favorable toxicity profile in preclinical models, CI-958 was chosen for further development. The Phase I study described here was undertaken to determine the toxicity profile, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics of CI-958 given as an i.v. infusion every 21 days. Adult patients with advanced refractory solid tumors who had adequate renal, hepatic, and hematological function, life expectancy, and performance status were eligible for this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Patients received a 1- or 2-h infusion of CI-958 at 21-day intervals. The starting dose was 5.2 mg/m2, and at least three patients were evaluated at each dose level before proceeding to a new dose level. A pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation design was used until reaching a predetermined target area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC), after which a modified Fibonacci scheme was used. Forty-four patients (21 men and 23 women; median age, 59 years) received 162 courses of CI-958. Neutropenia and hepatorenal toxicity were the dose-limiting toxicities, which defined the maximum tolerated dose of CI-958 to be 875 mg/m2 when given as a 2-h infusion every 21 days. There were no tumor responses. Two patients had stable disease for >250 days. The recommended Phase II dose is 560 mg/m2 for patients with significant prior chemotherapy and 700 mg/m2 for patients with minimal prior chemotherapy. Pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma and urine concentration-time data from each patient was performed. At the recommended Phase II dose of 700 mg/m2, mean CI-958 clearance was 370 ml/min/m2, mean AUC was 33800 ng·h/ml, and mean terminal half-life (t1/2) was 15.5 days. The clearance was similar at all doses, and plasma CI-958 AUC increased proportionally with dose, consistent with linear pharmacokinetics. The percentage reduction in absolute neutrophil count from baseline was well predicted by AUC using a simple Emax model. The pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation saved five to six dose levels in reaching the maximum tolerated dose compared with a standard dose escalation scheme. This may represent the most successful application to date of this dose escalation technique.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. D. Baker, J. Verweij, E. K. Rowinsky, R. C. Donehower, J. H. M. Schellens, L. B. Grochow, and A. Sparreboom
Role of Body Surface Area in Dosing of Investigational Anticancer Agents in Adults, 1991-2001
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 18, 2002; 94(24): 1883 - 1888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2000 by the American Association for Cancer Research.