
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Trials |
Departments of Pharmaceutical Sciences [M. K. M., W. C. Z., K. M. R., S. K. H., A. K. S., C. F. S.], Hematology and Oncology [W. L. F., V. M. S.], and Molecular Pharmacology [P. J. H.], St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105-2794, and Department of Pharmacology [P. J. H.] and The Center for Pediatric Pharmacokinetics and Therapeutics [P. J. H., C. F. S.], University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee 38163
Irinotecan
(IRN), a topoisomerase I interactive agent, has significant antitumor
activity in early Phase I studies in children with recurrent solid
tumors. However, the disposition of IRN and its metabolites, SN-38 and
APC, in children has not been reported. Children with solid tumors
refractory to conventional therapy received IRN by a 1-h i.v. infusion
at either 20, 24, or 29 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days
for 2 weeks. Serial blood samples were collected after doses 1 and 10
of the first course. IRN, SN-38, and APC lactone concentrations were
determined by an isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography
assay. A linear four-compartment model was fit simultaneously to the
IRN, SN-38, and APC plasma concentration versus time
data. Systemic clearance rate for IRN was 58.7 ± 18.8
liters/h/m2 (mean ± SD). The mean ± SD
ng/ml·h single-day lactone SN-38 area under the concentration-time
curve (AUC0
6) was 90.9 ± 96.4, 103.7 ± 62.4,
and 95.3 ± 63.9 at IRN doses of 20, 24, and 29 mg/m2,
respectively. The relative extent of IRN conversion to SN-38 and
metabolism to APC measured after dose 1 were 0.49 ± 0.33 and
0.29 ± 0.17 (mean ± SD). No statistically significant
intrapatient difference was noted for SN-38 area under the
concentration-time curve. Large interpatient variability in IRN and
metabolite disposition was observed. The relative extent of conversion
and the SN-38 systemic exposure achieved with this protracted schedule
of administration were much greater than reported in adults or children
receiving larger intermittent doses.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. R. Bomgaars, M. Bernstein, M. Krailo, R. Kadota, S. Das, Z. Chen, P. C. Adamson, and S. M. Blaney Phase II Trial of Irinotecan in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors: A Children's Oncology Group Study J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2007; 25(29): 4622 - 4627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Stewart, J. C. Panetta, M. A. O'Shaughnessy, S. L. Throm, C. H. Fraga, T. Owens, T. Liu, C. Billups, C. Rodriguez-Galindo, A. Gajjar, et al. UGT1A1 Promoter Genotype Correlates With SN-38 Pharmacokinetics, but Not Severe Toxicity in Patients Receiving Low-Dose Irinotecan J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2007; 25(18): 2594 - 2600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Danks, K. J. Yoon, R. A. Bush, J. S. Remack, M. Wierdl, L. Tsurkan, S. U. Kim, E. Garcia, M. Z. Metz, J. Najbauer, et al. Tumor-Targeted Enzyme/Prodrug Therapy Mediates Long-term Disease-Free Survival of Mice Bearing Disseminated Neuroblastoma Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 67(1): 22 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Michael, M. Brittain, J. Nagai, R. Feld, D. Hedley, A. Oza, L. Siu, and M. J. Moore Phase II Study of Activated Charcoal to Prevent Irinotecan-Induced Diarrhea J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2004; 22(21): 4410 - 4417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Vassal, F. Doz, D. Frappaz, K. Imadalou, E. Sicard, A. Santos, J. O'Quigley, C. Germa, M.-L. Risse, D. Mignard, et al. A Phase I Study of Irinotecan As a 3-Week Schedule in Children With Refractory or Recurrent Solid Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2003; 21(20): 3844 - 3852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-K. Souid, R. L. Dubowy, S. M. Blaney, L. Hershon, J. Sullivan, W. D. McLeod, and M. L. Bernstein Phase I Clinical and Pharmacologic Study of Weekly Cisplatin and Irinotecan Combined with Amifostine for Refractory Solid Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2003; 9(2): 703 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Xie, R. H.J. Mathijssen, A. Sparreboom, J. Verweij, and M. O. Karlsson Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan and Its Metabolites: A Population Analysis J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2002; 20(15): 3293 - 3301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Bomgaars, S. L. Berg, and S. M. Blaney The Development of Camptothecin Analogs in Childhood Cancers Oncologist, December 1, 2001; 6(6): 506 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Minami, H. Fujii, T. Igarashi, K. Itoh, K. Tamanoi, T. Oguma, and Y. Sasaki Phase I and Pharmacological Study of a New Camptothecin Derivative, Exatecan Mesylate (DX-8951f), Infused Over 30 Minutes Every Three Weeks Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2001; 7(10): 3056 - 3064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. J. Mathijssen, R. J. van Alphen, J. Verweij, W. J. Loos, K. Nooter, G. Stoter, and A. Sparreboom Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism of Irinotecan (CPT-11) Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 7(8): 2182 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Houghton, C. F. Stewart, P. J. Cheshire, L. B. Richmond, M. N. Kirstein, C. A. Poquette, M. Tan, H. S. Friedman, and T. P. Brent Antitumor Activity of Temozolomide Combined with Irinotecan Is Partly Independent of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase and Mismatch Repair Phenotypes in Xenograft Models Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2000; 6(10): 4110 - 4118. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |