This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Voigt, W. Articles by Schmoll, H-J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Voigt, W. Articles by Schmoll, H-J.

Schedule-dependent Antagonism of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Human Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Cell Lines

Klinik für Innere Med. IV [W.V., A.B., T.M., C.S., A.G., H-J.S.] and Klinik für Allgemeinchirurgie [C.H.-V.], Martin-Luther-Universität Halle, 06120 Halle/Saale, Germany

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) affects primarily elderly patients, with a median survival of 4–12 months after diagnosis. Presently, under clinical investigation the combination of cisplatin (CDDP) and gemcitabine (GEM) has promising activity in several of human tumor types. To develop new approaches for therapy of ATC, we evaluated the antineoplastic activity of GEM and CDDP alone (1-h and 24-h drug exposure) or in combination in the ATC cell lines SW1736, 8505C, C643, and HTh74. IC₅₀ values were determined by the sulforhodamine B assay, activity was evaluated by the relative antitumor activity (RAA) and drug interaction assessed by isobologram analysis. GEM seemed to be active in ATC, with RAA ranging from 12–114 and CDDP only modestly active (RAA, 0.24–1.4). In four different drug schedules tested, the drug combination was additive when GEM preceded CDDP exposure (combination index, 1), whereas when CDDP preceded GEM exposure the combination was significantly antagonistic (combination index, >1). In SW1736 and 8505C cells, we observed a strong S phase arrest and DNA synthesis inhibition 24 h after a 1-h exposure to an IC₅₀ of CDDP. On the basis of molecular drug targets, cell cycle arrest points, and DNA synthesis inhibition, a model was developed to explain the interaction observed for the combination of GEM and CDDP.

In conclusion, GEM shows promising cytostatic activity in ATC. Interaction of GEM and CDDP was schedule and dose dependent, favoring a regime in which GEM is followed by CDDP. Additionally, our model system suggests that DNA-synthesis inhibition and S phase arrest may be important determinants for the drug interaction between GEM and CDDP.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Antonelli, S. M. Ferrari, P. Fallahi, P. Berti, G. Materazzi, I. Marchetti, C. Ugolini, F. Basolo, P. Miccoli, and E. Ferrannini Evaluation of the sensitivity to chemotherapeutics or thiazolidinediones of primary anaplastic thyroid cancer cells obtained by fine-needle aspiration Eur. J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2008; 159(3): 283 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Bravo, M. E.R. Garcia-Rendueles, R. Seoane, V. Dosil, J. Cameselle-Teijeiro, L. Lopez-Lazaro, J. Zalvide, F. Barreiro, C. M. Pombo, and C. V. Alvarez Plitidepsin Has a Cytostatic Effect in Human Undifferentiated (Anaplastic) Thyroid Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 11(21): 7664 - 7673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Crul, N. E. Schoemaker, D. Pluim, M. Maliepaard, R. W. M. Underberg, M. Schot, R. W. Sparidans, P. Baas, J. H. Beijnen, N. van Zandwijk, et al. Randomized Phase I Clinical and Pharmacologic Study of Weekly versus Twice-Weekly Dose-intensive Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2003; 9(10): 3526 - 3533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Ricotti, A. Tesei, F. De Paola, P. Ulivi, G. L. Frassineti, C. Milandri, D. Amadori, and W. Zoli In Vitro Schedule-dependent Interaction between Docetaxel and Gemcitabine in Human Gastric Cancer Cell Lines Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2003; 9(2): 900 - 905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]