This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dowlati, A. Articles by Willson, J. K. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dowlati, A. Articles by Willson, J. K. V.

Sequential Tumor Biopsies in Early Phase Clinical Trials of Anticancer Agents for Pharmacodynamic Evaluation¹

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine and Developmental Therapeutics Program, Ireland Cancer Center at University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106

Purpose: In the setting of target-based anticancer drug development, it is critical to establish that the observed preclinical activity can be attributed to modulation of the intended target in early phase trials in human subjects. This paradigm of target modulation allows us to determine a Phase II or III dose (optimal biochemical/biological modulatory dose) that may not necessarily be the maximum tolerated dose. A major obstacle to target-based (often cytostatic) drug development has been obtaining relevant tumor tissue during clinical trials of these novel agents for laboratory analysis of the putative marker of drug effect.

Experimental Design: From 1989 to present, we have completed seven clinical trials in which the end point was a biochemical or biological modulatory dose in human tumor tissues (not surrogate tissue). Eligibility enrollment required that patients have a biopsiable lesion either with computerized tomography (CT) guidance or direct visualization and consent to sequential (pre and posttreatment) biopsies.

Results: A total of 192 biopsies were performed in 107 patients. All but 8 patients had sequential pre and posttreatment biopsies. Seventy-eight (73%) of the 107 patients had liver lesion biopsies. In eight patients, either one or both biopsies contained insufficient viable tumor tissue or no tumor tissue at all for analysis. Of a total of 99 patients in whom we attempted to obtain paired biopsies, a total of 87 (88%) were successful. Reasons for failure included patient refusal for a second biopsy (n = 2), vasovagal reaction with first biopsy precluding a second biopsy (n = 1), subcapsular hepatic bleeding (n = 1), and most commonly obtaining necrotic tumor, fibrous, or normal tissue in one of the two sequential biopsies (n = 8).

Conclusions: This is the first and largest reported series demonstrating that with adequate precautions and experience, sequential tumor biopsies are feasible and safe during early phase clinical trials.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Kummar, R. Kinders, M. E. Gutierrez, L. Rubinstein, R. E. Parchment, L. R. Phillips, J. Ji, A. Monks, J. A. Low, A. Chen, et al. Phase 0 Clinical Trial of the Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor ABT-888 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2009; 27(16): 2705 - 2711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Dowlati, S. Manda, J. Gibbons, S. C. Remick, L. Patrick, and P. Fu Multi-Institutional Phase I Trials of Anticancer Agents J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2008; 26(12): 1926 - 1931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Banerji, J. de Bono, I. Judson, S. Kaye, and P. Workman Biomarkers In Early Clinical Trials: the Committed and the Skeptics Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 14(8): 2512 - 2512. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Italiano, C. Massard, R. Bahleda, A.-L. Vataire, E. Deutsch, N. Magne, J.-P. Pignon, G. Vassal, J.-P. Armand, and J.-C. Soria Treatment outcome and survival in participants of phase I oncology trials carried out from 2003 to 2006 at Institut Gustave Roussy Ann. Onc., April 1, 2008; 19(4): 787 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Ma and A. Chan Transcriptional profiling of tumor biopsies in oncology trials--a 'window' of opportunity for evaluating new drugs in nasopharyngeal cancer? Ann. Onc., November 1, 2006; 17(11): 1611 - 1613. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. R. Helft and C. K. Daugherty Are We Taking Without Giving in Return? The Ethics of Research-Related Biopsies and the Benefits of Clinical Trial Participation J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2006; 24(30): 4793 - 4795. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Agulnik, A. M. Oza, G. R. Pond, and L. L. Siu Impact and Perceptions of Mandatory Tumor Biopsies for Correlative Studies in Clinical Trials of Novel Anticancer Agents J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2006; 24(30): 4801 - 4807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Dowlati, K. Robertson, T. Radivoyevitch, J. Waas, N. P. Ziats, P. Hartman, F. W. Abdul-Karim, J. K. Wasman, J. Jesberger, J. Lewin, et al. Novel Phase I Dose De-escalation Design Trial to Determine the Biological Modulatory Dose of the Antiangiogenic Agent SU5416 Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 11(21): 7938 - 7944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Kaur, D. Belotti, A. M. Burger, K. Fisher-Nielson, P. Borsotti, E. Riccardi, J. Thillainathan, M. Hollingshead, E. A. Sausville, and R. Giavazzi Antiangiogenic Properties of 17-(Dimethylaminoethylamino)-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin: An Orally Bioavailable Heat Shock Protein 90 Modulator Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2004; 10(14): 4813 - 4821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. F. Lang, M. R. Gilbert, V. K. Puduvalli, J. Weinberg, V. A. Levin, W.K. A. Yung, R. Sawaya, G. N. Fuller, and C. A. Conrad Toward better early-phase brain tumor clinical trials: A reappraisal of current methods and proposals for future strategies Neuro-oncol, October 1, 2002; 4(4): 268 - 277. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Fox, G. A. Curt, and F. M. Balis Clinical Trial Design for Target-Based Therapy Oncologist, October 1, 2002; 7(5): 401 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Gerson Clinical Relevance of MGMT in the Treatment of Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2002; 20(9): 2388 - 2399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]