Clinical Cancer Research Meeting Calendar Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lyass, O.
Right arrow Articles by Gabizon, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lyass, O.
Right arrow Articles by Gabizon, A. A.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 7, 3040-3046, October 2001
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research


Regular Articles

Phase I Study of Doxil-Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Malignancies1

Olga Lyass, Ayala Hubert and Alberto A. Gabizon2

Department of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel

Purpose: Our first objective was to evaluate the feasibility of administering a combination of Doxil, a pegylated liposome formulation of doxorubicin, and cisplatin and to determine the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. A secondary objective was to examine Doxil peak and 7-day postinjection plasma levels at the various dose levels tested.

Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated every 4 weeks with cisplatin on day 1 and Doxil on day 2. In the first three dose levels, the dose of Doxil was fixed at 40 mg/m2, whereas the dose of cisplatin was escalated from 40 to 50 and 60 mg/m2. At the fourth and fifth dose levels, the dose of cisplatin was fixed at 60 mg/m2, whereas the dose of Doxil was escalated to 50 and to 60 mg/m2. Plasma Doxil (doxorubicin-equivalent) levels were measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography assay with fluorescence detection at 1 h and 7 days after infusion of Doxil.

Results: Twenty-six patients entered the study. Twenty-four patients completed a minimum of 2 courses and were fully assessable for toxicity and efficacy. Eighteen patients had received prior chemotherapy, 11 of them with anthracycline-containing regimens. A total of 177 courses were administered within the study. In 12 patients, cisplatin was discontinued after 1 to 13 courses, and Doxil was continued alone for 1–22 courses. All other patients received both drugs until discontinuation of therapy. The dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and mucositis. Grade 4 neutropenia was seen in 3 patients (one with neutropenic fever) at dose levels 4 and 5. Grade 3 mucositis was observed in 4 patients at dose levels 3, 4, and 5. In contrast, the most severe palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia manifestation was grade 2 seen in 1 patient only. Tumor responses included seven partial responses, of which three were in ovarian cancer patients. In four of seven responders, the time to disease progression exceeded 1 year. Doxil 1-h (Cmax equivalent) levels were assessed in 20 patients. The mean Doxil Cmax (mg/l plasma) increased gradually with dose escalation from 14.7 ± 1.9 for 40 mg/m2, to 17.3 ± 3.0 for 50 mg/m2, and 23.3 ± 5.5 for 60 mg/m2. The 60 mg/m2 Cmax was similar to data obtained in parallel clinical studies at our institution with single-agent Doxil at 60 mg/m2. However, the 7-day Doxil postinfusion levels were significantly lower in patients receiving the Doxil-cisplatin combination than in those receiving single-agent Doxil.

Conclusion: Doxil can be administered at full maximum tolerated dose (50 mg/m2 every 4 weeks) in combination with 60 mg/m2 cisplatin, with no evidence of major overlapping toxicities. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia incidence and severity appears to be diminished, in comparison with data available for single-agent Doxil. Plasma concentration data point to an accelerated clearance of Doxil when administered after cisplatin.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
W. C. Zamboni
Concept and Clinical Evaluation of Carrier-Mediated Anticancer Agents
Oncologist, March 1, 2008; 13(3): 248 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. Chanan-Khan, J. Szebeni, S. Savay, L. Liebes, N. M. Rafique, C. R. Alving, and F. M. Muggia
Complement activation following first exposure to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil(R)): possible role in hypersensitivity reactions
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2003; 14(9): 1430 - 1437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2001 by the American Association for Cancer Research.