Clinical Cancer Research CR Helping Patients Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chassevent, A.
Right arrow Articles by Spyratos, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chassevent, A.
Right arrow Articles by Spyratos, F.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 7, 909-917, April 2001
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

S-Phase Fraction and DNA Ploidy in 633 T1T2 Breast Cancers

A Standardized Flow Cytometric Study

Agnès Chassevent1, Marie-Lise Jourdan, Sylvie Romain, Françoise Descotes, Marc Colonna, Pierre-Marie Martin, Michel Bolla2, Frédérique Spyratos and for Multicenter Study Group PHRC953

Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France [A. C.]; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Tours, France [M-L. J.]; AP-HM, Marseille, France [S. R., P-M. M.]; CHU-Lyon Sud, France [F. D.]; CHU, Grenoble, France [M. C., M. B.]; and Centre René Huguenin, St-Cloud, France [F. S.]

The lack of a standardized methodology for quantifying DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) by flow cytometry is hindering routine use of these markers in breast cancer management. In a retrospective clinical multicenter study, we validated a standardized flow cytometry protocol. We tested 633 frozen T1T2, N0N1, M0 breast tumors obtained in four institutions. Cell preparation was standardized, and precise rules for data interpretation were followed. Three SPF classes were defined on the basis of tertiles after adjustment for ploidy. DNA aneuploidy was observed in 61.0% of cases. No significant difference was observed among centers. Aneuploidy and high SPF were associated with large tumor size, node involvement, high histological grade, and hormone receptor negativity. In the overall population (median follow-up, 69 months), patients with medium and high SPF values had shorter disease-free survival (DFS) than those with low SPF values (P < 0.0001). Ploidy had no significant influence. By Cox analysis, SPF, pN, and estrogen receptor status were independent predictors of DFS (P = 0.0002, P = 0.001, and P = 0.05). In node-negative patients, SPF was the only predictor of DFS (P = 0.01), whereas in node-positive patients, the risk of relapse increased with both high SPF (P = 0.003) and estrogen receptor negativity (P = 0.004). Low SPF values distinguished grade II tumors with a particularly good outcome. Our results strongly support the use of SPF in multicenter studies and clinical trials and suggest that node-negative patients with slowly proliferating tumors do not require systemic adjuvant therapy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. G. Molenkamp, B. J.R. Sluijter, P. A.M. van Leeuwen, S. J.A.M. Santegoets, S. Meijer, P. G.J.T.B. Wijnands, J. B.A.G. Haanen, A. J.M. van den Eertwegh, R. J. Scheper, and T. D. de Gruijl
Local Administration of PF-3512676 CpG-B Instigates Tumor-Specific CD8+ T-Cell Reactivity in Melanoma Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 14(14): 4532 - 4542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Harris, H. Fritsche, R. Mennel, L. Norton, P. Ravdin, S. Taube, M. R. Somerfield, D. F. Hayes, and R. C. Bast Jr
American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2007; 25(33): 5287 - 5312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. J.C.L.M. Vuylsteke, B. G. Molenkamp, P. A.M. van Leeuwen, S. Meijer, P. G.J.T.B. Wijnands, J. B.A.G. Haanen, R. J. Scheper, and T. D. de Gruijl
Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Reactivity in the Sentinel Lymph Node of GM-CSF-Treated Stage I Melanoma Patients is Associated with High Myeloid Dendritic Cell Content.
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2006; 12(9): 2826 - 2833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Colozza, E. Azambuja, F. Cardoso, C. Sotiriou, D. Larsimont, and M. J. Piccart
Proliferative markers as prognostic and predictive tools in early breast cancer: where are we now?
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2005; 16(11): 1723 - 1739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. L. Slingluff Jr
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol., September 15, 2004; 22(18): 3835 - 3835.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2001 by the American Association for Cancer Research.