
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Department of Urology, Urological Oncology Research Laboratory [J. D., R. S., M. S., J. S. G., Y. P., D. N., D. M. N.], and Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology [D. M. N.], Joan and Stanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, and Departments of Medical Physics and Radiology [S. X., J. A. K.], and the Department of Urology [M. G., C. T. P.], Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021
Expression of neutral endopeptidase (NEP) 24.11 is diminished in metastatic, androgen-independent prostate cancers (PCs; C. N. Papandreou et al., Nat. Med., 4: 5057, 1998). To determine the effects on androgen-independent PC cells of overexpressing cell-surface NEP, an inducible tetracycline-regulatory gene expression system was used to stably introduce and express the NEP gene in androgen-independent TSU-Pr1 cells generating WT-5 cells, which expressed high levels of enzymatically active NEP protein when cultured in the absence of tetracycline. TN12 cells, which contain the identical vectors without the NEP gene and do not express NEP, were used as control. Expression of NEP in WT-5 cells after removal of tetracycline from the media resulted in a >80% inhibition in cell proliferation over a 1-week period (P < 0.005) compared with control cells. Tumor formation occurred in the prostate glands of orthotopically injected athymic mice killed at 30 days in 4 of 5 mice that were given injections of 2 x 106 WT-5 cells and were fed doxycycline (NEP suppressed), and in all mice that were given injections of TN12 cells and were fed with or without doxycycline. In contrast, only 1 of 5 mouse prostates developed a tumor in mice that were given injections of WT-5 cells and that did not receive doxycycline. Analysis of the mechanisms of NEP-induced growth suppression revealed that NEP expression in WT-5 cells induced a 4-fold increase in the number of PC cells undergoing apoptosis, and increased the expression of p21 tumor suppressor gene protein and the level of unphosphorylated retinoblastoma protein as determined by Western blot. Flow cytometric analysis show that induced NEP expression in WT-5 cells resulted in a G1 cell cycle arrest. These data show that NEP can inhibit PC cell growth and tumorigenicity and suggest that NEP has potential as therapy for androgen-independent PC.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Peng, C. X. Li, F. Chen, Z. Wang, M. Ligr, J. Melamed, J. Wei, W. Gerald, M. Pagano, M. J. Garabedian, et al. Stimulation of Prostate Cancer Cellular Proliferation and Invasion by the Androgen Receptor Co-Activator ARA70 Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2008; 172(1): 225 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. B. Goodman Jr., M. Febbraio, R. Simantov, R. Zheng, R. Shen, R. L. Silverstein, and D. M. Nanus Neprilysin Inhibits Angiogenesis via Proteolysis of Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2006; 281(44): 33597 - 33605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S Perry, R. Foley, K. Woodson, and M. Lawler The emerging roles of DNA methylation in the clinical management of prostate cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2006; 13(2): 357 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kajiyama, K. Shibata, M. Terauchi, T. Morita, K. Ino, S. Mizutani, and F. Kikkawa Neutral Endopeptidase 24.11/CD10 Suppresses Progressive Potential in Ovarian Carcinoma In vitro and In vivo Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1798 - 1808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Iwase, R. Shen, D. Navarro, and D. M. Nanus Direct Binding of Neutral Endopeptidase 24.11 to Ezrin/Radixin/Moesin (ERM) Proteins Competes with the Interaction of CD44 with ERM Proteins J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 2004; 279(12): 11898 - 11905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sumitomo, T. Asano, J. Asakuma, T. Asano, D. M. Nanus, and M. Hayakawa Chemosensitization of Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer with Neutral Endopeptidase Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2004; 10(1): 260 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Nanus Of Peptides and Peptidases: The Role of Cell Surface Peptidases in Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 9(17): 6307 - 6309. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Baldi, L. Bonaccorsi, and G. Forti Androgen Receptor: Good Guy or Bad Guy in Prostate Cancer Invasion? Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 1653 - 1655. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Jiang and Z. Wang Identification of Androgen-Responsive Genes in the Rat Ventral Prostate by Complementary Deoxyribonucleic Acid Subtraction and Microarray Endocrinology, April 1, 2003; 144(4): 1257 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dai, R. Shen, M. Sumitomo, R. Stahl, D. Navarro, M. C. Gershengorn, and D. M. Nanus Synergistic Activation of the Androgen Receptor by Bombesin and Low-Dose Androgen Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2002; 8(7): 2399 - 2405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |