Clinical Cancer Research CR Balducci Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christ, O.
Right arrow Articles by Zöller, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christ, O.
Right arrow Articles by Zöller, M.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 7, 1385-1397, May 2001
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research


Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology

Interleukin 2-Antibody and Tumor Necrosis Factor-Antibody Fusion Proteins Induce Different Antitumor Immune Responses in Vivo1

Oliver Christ, Siegfried Matzku, Christa Burger and Margot Zöller2

Departments of Tumor Progression and Immune Defense, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg [O. C., M. Z.]; Department of Immunology and Oncology, Preclinical Pharma Research, Merck KGa, 64271 Darmstadt [S. M., C. B.]; and Department of Applied Genetics, University of Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe [S. M., M. Z.], Germany

Two fusion proteins, composed of interleukin 2 (IL-2) or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) coupled to an antibody [fusion protein (FuP); IL-2-FuP or TNF-FuP], were capable of retarding growth of a human malignant melanoma in the severe combined immunodeficient mouse depending on the concomitant application of human peripheral blood leukocytes. Here we have analyzed the mechanisms that determine the therapeutic effect. Tumor-bearing severe combined immunodeficient mice received once per week an i.v. injection of HLA-matched peripheral blood leukocytes and twice per week i.v. or intratumoral injections of FuPs. Leukocyte recovery and their activation state were monitored. The number of draining lymph node cells (LNCs) and tumor-infiltrating leukocytes increased continuously, and the yield of draining LNCs was improved significantly when the FuPs were applied locally. In IL-2-FuP-treated mice, the majority of draining LNCs and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes expressed T-cell activation markers and IL-2, thus being classified as T helper type 1 cells. These cells displayed strong proliferative activity and initiated activation of lymphokine-activated killer cells and CTLs. TNF-FuP supported activation of CTLs and of monocytes as revealed by TNF expression and cytostatic activity. Neither the antibody, nor IL-2, nor TNF, nor the mixture of antibody and cytokines exhibited the full-fledged activational potency of the FuPs. Notably, activation of immune effector mechanisms was much stronger when the FuPs were applied intratumorally. This is the first report to show that FuPs are efficient immunostimulants in vivo for native leukocytes. Although IL-2-FuP induced a T helper type 1 response with recruitment of LAK and CTL, TNF-FuP efficiently recruited and activated monocytes and, in a less pronounced manner, CTLs.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2001 by the American Association for Cancer Research.