Clinical Cancer Research CR Balducci Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zamboni, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Egorin, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zamboni, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Egorin, M. J.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 7, 2301-2308, August 2001
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research


Regular Articles

Pharmacodynamic Model of Topotecan-induced Time Course of Neutropenia1

William C. Zamboni2, David Z. D’Argenio, Clinton F. Stewart, Tom MacVittie, Brian J. Delauter, Ann M. Farese, Douglas M. Potter, Nacole M. Kubat, David Tubergen and Merrill J. Egorin

Program of Molecular Therapeutics and Drug Discovery [W. C. Z., B. J. D., N. M. K., M. J. E.] and Biostatistics Facility [D. M. P.], University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy [W. C. Z.], University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213; Departments of Medicine [W. C. Z., M. J. E.] and Pharmacology [M. J. E.], School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089 [D. Z. D.]; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105 [C. F. S.]; Center for Pediatric Pharmacokinetics and Therapeutics, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee 38105 [C. F. S.]; Department of Pathology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 [T. M., A. M. F.]; and Department of Hematology Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 [D. T.]

Pharmacodynamic measures of neutropenia, such as absolute neutrophil count at nadir and neutrophil survival fraction, may not reflect the overall time course of neutropenia. We developed a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model to describe and quantify the time course of neutropenia after administration of topotecan to children and to compare this with nonhuman primates (NHPs) as a potential preclinical model of neutropenia. Topotecan was administered as a 30-min infusion daily for 5 days, repeated every 21 days. As part of a Phase I Pediatric Oncology Group study, topotecan was administered at 1.4 and 1.7 mg/m2/day without filgrastim (POG), and at 1.7, 2, and 2.4 mg/m2/day with filgrastim (POG+G). In NHPs, topotecan was administered at 5, 10, and 20 mg/m2/day without filgrastim. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was fit to profiles of topotecan lactone plasma concentrations and neutrophil survival fraction from cycle 1 and used to calculate topotecan lactone area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve from 0 to 120 h (AUCLAC) and the area between the baseline and treatment-related neutrophil survival fraction (ABC) from 0 to 700 h. The mean ± SD neutrophil survival fraction at nadir for the POG, POG+G, and NHP groups was 0.12 ± 0.09, 0.11 ± 0.17, and 0.09 ± 0.08, respectively (P > 0.05). The mean ± SD for the ratio of ABC to AUCLAC for the POG and NHP groups was 1.02 ± 0.38 and 0.16 ± 0.09, respectively (P < 0.05). The model estimate of ABC and the ratio of ABC to AUCLAC in children and NHPs may better reflect sensitivity to chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. C. Panetta, P. Schaiquevich, V. M. Santana, and C. F. Stewart
Using Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Simulation to Evaluate Importance of Schedule in Topotecan Therapy for Pediatric Neuroblastoma
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 318 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. Minami
A Point, a Line, or an Area? Which Is the Most Important in the Pharmacological Analysis of Cancer Chemotherapy?
J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2005; 23(3): 405 - 406.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. E. Friberg, A. Henningsson, H. Maas, L. Nguyen, and M. O. Karlsson
Model of Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression With Parameter Consistency Across Drugs
J. Clin. Oncol., December 15, 2002; 20(24): 4713 - 4721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2001 by the American Association for Cancer Research.