
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar [N. H., U. A., R. E. K., M. S.], Institut für Medizinische Statistik und Epidemiologie (IMSE) [U. B.], Institut für Experimentelle Onkologie und Therapieforschung [A. K.], and Institut für Pathologie [H. H.], Technische Universität München, D-81675 Munich, and Universitätsfrauenklinik Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg [C. T., F. J.], Germany
Purpose: Prognostic and predictive impact of five proteolytic factors associated with tumor invasion and metastasis in primary breast cancer were evaluated after long-term follow-up.
Experimental Design: Antigen levels of urokinase-type plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), Cathepsins B, D, and L were determined using immunochemical assays in primary tumor tissue of 276 patients.
Results: During follow-up (median 109 months), 119 (43%) patients relapsed, and 117 (42%) died. In the whole collective, lymph node status (P < 0.001; RR 3.8), Cathepsin L (P < 0.001; RR 2.6), and PAI-1 (P = 0.027; RR 1.7) were the only independent significant factors in multivariate analysis for disease-free survival (DFS). For overall survival (OS), lymph node status (P < 0.001; RR 2.9), Cathepsin L (P = 0.017; RR 1.9), PAI-1 (P = 0.01; RR 1.9), and grading (P = 0.026; RR 1.7) were significant. In the node-negative subgroup, PAI-1 was the only significant factor for DFS (P = 0.004; RR 3.7) and the strongest factor (P = 0.004; RR 3.7) for OS next to grading (P = 0.017; RR 3.1). In node-positive patients, Cathepsin L was the only significant factor for both DFS (P < 0.001; RR 3.2) and OS (P = 0.003; RR 2.5). For all proteolytic factors but Cathepsin L, the univariate prognostic impact on DFS was substantial in patients without adjuvant systemic therapy but was diminished if adjuvant therapy had been administered. Cathepsin L maintained its strong prognostic impact on DFS even in patients with adjuvant endocrine therapy (P = 0.01; RR 2.8).
Conclusions: The observed effect of adjuvant systemic therapy on their prognostic strength suggests that the assessed proteolytic factors supply predictive information on therapy response.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Thussbas, J. Nahrig, S. Streit, J. Bange, M. Kriner, R. Kates, K. Ulm, M. Kiechle, H. Hoefler, A. Ullrich, et al. FGFR4 Arg388 Allele Is Associated With Resistance to Adjuvant Therapy in Primary Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2006; 24(23): 3747 - 3755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Scorilas, C. A. Borgono, N. Harbeck, J. Dorn, B. Schmalfeldt, M. Schmitt, and E. P. Diamandis Human Kallikrein 13 Protein in Ovarian Cancer Cytosols: A New Favorable Prognostic Marker J. Clin. Oncol., February 15, 2004; 22(4): 678 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Zemzoum, R. E. Kates, J. S. Ross, P. Dettmar, M. Dutta, C. Henrichs, S. Yurdseven, H. Hofler, M. Kiechle, M. Schmitt, et al. Invasion Factors uPA/PAI-1 and HER2 Status Provide Independent and Complementary Information on Patient Outcome in Node-Negative Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2003; 21(6): 1022 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Harbeck, R. E. Kates, M. P. Look, M. E. Meijer-van Gelder, J. G. M. Klijn, A. Kruger, M. Kiechle, F. Janicke, M. Schmitt, and J. A. Foekens Enhanced Benefit from Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients Classified High-Risk according to Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator (uPA) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Type 1 (n = 3424) Cancer Res., August 15, 2002; 62(16): 4617 - 4622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Guo, A. P. Mazar, J.-J. Lebrun, and S. A. Rabbani An Antiangiogenic Urokinase-derived Peptide Combined with Tamoxifen Decreases Tumor Growth and Metastasis in a Syngeneic Model of Breast Cancer Cancer Res., August 15, 2002; 62(16): 4678 - 4684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Rabbani and J. Gladu Urokinase Receptor Antibody Can Reduce Tumor Volume and Detect the Presence of Occult Tumor Metastases in Vivo Cancer Res., April 1, 2002; 62(8): 2390 - 2397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |