
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Trials |
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 [L. A. C., M. D., M. R. P.]; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts [J. P. E., M. R. P.]; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 [L. A. C., J. P. E., M. R. P.]
Purpose: Prostate cancer consistently remains a difficult clinical problem. The development of novel therapy strategies for effective control and treatment of prostate cancer is essential. The prostate represents a unique site for immunotherapy, in part because prostate-specific immunity would most probably be without significant long-term sequellae. Antibodies and cell-mediated immunity, induced by either active or passive immunization, represent potential means to specifically target prostate tumor cells.
Experimental Design: The serum IgG response to cell surface antigens expressed on LNCAP [prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-positive] and PC-3 (PSA-negative) were analyzed in individuals with advanced disease receiving vaccinia- or fowlpox-expressed PSA (v-PSA or f-PSA, respectively) by flow cytometry.
Results: Sera from all seven patients in a Phase I study of v-PSA, collected prior to the third immunization, reacted with both prostate tumor cell lines. The majority of individuals (n = 12) in a Phase II trial of v-PSA and f-PSA developed sustainable antibody responses to cell surface antigens on the prostate tumor cell lines. The magnitude and kinetics of these responses were dependent on the immunization schedule. Of importance, the baseline serum of only one of nine patients tested had reactivity with nonprostate tumor cell lines. Sera from three normal males also lacked reactivity with prostate tumor cells.
Conclusions: PSA vaccine constructs are immunogenic and induce antibody responses to a multitude of surface antigens on prostate tumor cell lines by epitope or determinant spreading after stimulation of the immune system by PSA immunization.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Schlom, J. L. Gulley, and P. M. Arlen Paradigm Shifts in Cancer Vaccine Therapy Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2008; 233(5): 522 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schlom, P. M. Arlen, and J. L. Gulley Cancer Vaccines: Moving Beyond Current Paradigms Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 13(13): 3776 - 3782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Nesslinger, R. A. Sahota, B. Stone, K. Johnson, N. Chima, C. King, D. Rasmussen, D. Bishop, P. S. Rennie, M. Gleave, et al. Standard Treatments Induce Antigen-Specific Immune Responses in Prostate Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 13(5): 1493 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kudo-Saito, J. Schlom, and J. W. Hodge Induction of an Antigen Cascade by Diversified Subcutaneous/Intratumoral Vaccination Is Associated with Antitumor Responses Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2005; 11(6): 2416 - 2426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |