
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Departments of Internal Medicine [S-W. C.], Microbiology [K. J. L., Y-A. B., M-G. R.], and Clinical Pathology [K-O. M., M-S. K., K-M. K.], College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Korea
Purpose: Colorectal cancers harbor one of two distinct alterations, unilateral chromosomal loss as evidenced by a loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and microsatellite instability (MSI), as represented by the widespread insertion or deletion of simple repeat nucleotides. We investigated the relationships between the clinicopathological features and microsatellite alterations (LOH and MSI) of 168 colorectal cancers.
Experimental Design: The concerted and individual effects of various chromosomal losses on survival were comparatively analyzed using a reference panel of 40 microsatellite markers in eight cancer-related chromosomes, 3p, 4p, 5q, 8p, 9p, 13q, 17p, and 18q.
Results: Of the 168 colorectal cancers tested, 29 (17%) with high-frequency MSI were associated with good survival (P < 0.05). The extent of LOH detected in 139 (83%) cases without MSI was classified as low level involving three or fewer arms (35%), moderate level involving four arms (22%), or high level involving five or more arms (43%). High-level loss correlated with earlier onset, lymphatic invasion, and rectal location, whereas low-level loss was more common in proximal colon and stages I and II (P < 0.05). The survival curve and multivariate analysis identified high- and low-level chromosomal loss as the most significant predictor of poor and good survival, respectively (log-rank test, P < 0.0001), in patients with stage II (hazard ratio, 6.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.9919.7; P = 0.0017) and those with stage III (hazard ratio, 10.89; 95% confidence interval, 2.5446.77; P = 0.0013). Moderate chromosomal loss showed dual prognostic values associated with favorable stage II and unfavorable stage III. Single chromosomal losses tended to play a role as a part of the concerted chromosomal function.
Conclusion: The classification of colorectal cancer based on chromosomal loss and MSI provides a prognostic index that reflects tumor pathobiology.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A Walther, R Houlston, and I Tomlinson Association between chromosomal instability and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis Gut, July 1, 2008; 57(7): 941 - 950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ogino and A. Goel Molecular Classification and Correlates in Colorectal Cancer J. Mol. Diagn., January 1, 2008; 10(1): 13 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Z. Pang, L.-X. Qin, N. Ren, Z.-Y. Hei, Q.-H. Ye, W.-D. Jia, B.-S. Sun, G.-L. Lin, D.-Y. Liu, Y.-K. Liu, et al. Loss of Heterozygosity at D8S298 Is a Predictor for Long-term Survival of Patients with Tumor-Node-Metastasis Stage I of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 13(24): 7363 - 7369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Maeda, T. Chiba, S. Kawashiri, T. Satoh, and K. Imai Epigenetic Inactivation of I{kappa}B Kinase-{alpha} in Oral Carcinomas and Tumor Progression Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 13(17): 5041 - 5047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Boardman, R. A. Johnson, G. M. Petersen, A. L. Oberg, B. F. Kabat, J. P. Slusser, L. Wang, B. W. Morlan, A. J. French, T. C. Smyrk, et al. Higher Frequency of Diploidy in Young-Onset Microsatellite-Stable Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 13(8): 2323 - 2328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Y. Locker, S. Hamilton, J. Harris, J. M. Jessup, N. Kemeny, J. S. Macdonald, M. R. Somerfield, D. F. Hayes, and R. C. Bast Jr ASCO 2006 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Gastrointestinal Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2006; 24(33): 5313 - 5327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ji, J. Kumm, M. Zhang, K. Farnam, K. Salari, M. Faham, J. M. Ford, and R. W. Davis Molecular Inversion Probe Analysis of Gene Copy Alterations Reveals Distinct Categories of Colorectal Carcinoma Cancer Res., August 15, 2006; 66(16): 7910 - 7919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Lanza, R. Gafa, A. Santini, I. Maestri, L. Guerzoni, and L. Cavazzini Immunohistochemical Test for MLH1 and MSH2 Expression Predicts Clinical Outcome in Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer Patients J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2006; 24(15): 2359 - 2367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Orita, N. Sakamoto, Y. Ajioka, T. Terai, O. Hino, N. Sato, T. Shimoda, T. Kamano, M. Tsurumaru, and H. Fujii Allelic loss analysis of early-stage flat-type colorectal tumors Ann. Onc., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Matsuzaki, G. Deng, H. Tanaka, S. Kakar, S. Miura, and Y. S. Kim The Relationship between Global Methylation Level, Loss of Heterozygosity, and Microsatellite Instability in Sporadic Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2005; 11(24): 8564 - 8569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Westra, M. Schaapveld, H. Hollema, J. P. de Boer, M. M.J. Kraak, D. de Jong, A. ter Elst, N. H. Mulder, C. H.C.M. Buys, R. M.W. Hofstra, et al. Determination of TP53 Mutation Is More Relevant Than Microsatellite Instability Status for the Prediction of Disease-Free Survival in Adjuvant-Treated Stage III Colon Cancer Patients J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5635 - 5643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Mehta, K. Nakao, M. B. Zuraek, D. T. Ruan, E. K. Bergsland, A. P. Venook, D. H. Moore, T. A. Tokuyasu, A. N. Jain, R. S. Warren, et al. Fractional Genomic Alteration Detected by Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Independently Predicts Survival after Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1791 - 1797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Popat, R. Hubner, and R.S. Houlston Systematic Review of Microsatellite Instability and Colorectal Cancer Prognosis J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2005; 23(3): 609 - 618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nakao, K. R. Mehta, J. Fridlyand, D. H. Moore, A. N. Jain, A. Lafuente, J. W. Wiencke, J. P. Terdiman, and F. M. Waldman High-resolution analysis of DNA copy number alterations in colorectal cancer by array-based comparative genomic hybridization Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2004; 25(8): 1345 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bardi, C. Fenger, B. Johansson, F. Mitelman, and S. Heim Tumor Karyotype Predicts Clinical Outcome in Colorectal Cancer Patients J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2004; 22(13): 2623 - 2634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Graziano and S. Cascinu Prognostic molecular markers for planning adjuvant chemotherapy trials in Dukes' B colorectal cancer patients: how much evidence is enough? Ann. Onc., July 1, 2003; 14(7): 1026 - 1038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ott, H. Vogelsang, J. Mueller, K. Becker, M. Muller, U. Fink, J. R. Siewert, H. Hofler, and G. Keller Chromosomal Instability Rather Than p53 Mutation Is Associated with Response to Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Gastric Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 9(6): 2307 - 2315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |