
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Supplement |
Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook and Womens College Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto at Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5 Canada
Endocrine therapy remains an important approach to the treatment of metastatic breast cancer because of its effectiveness and excellent tolerability. In the last 10 years, a number of new endocrine therapies have been introduced. These include the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists, which produce menopausal changes in premenopausal women; the aromatase inhibitors, which prevent production of estrogen in postmenopausal women; and the estrogen receptor down-regulator fulvestrant (Faslodex), which is effective in postmenopausal women whose tumors have progressed following response to other selective estrogen receptor modulators. The endocrine cascade for the treatment of premenopausal women with metastatic disease now involves the concurrent or sequential combination of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue and tamoxifen, whereas the cascade for the treatment of postmenopausal women can begin with tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor or with an aromatase inhibitor followed by tamoxifen. The optimal cascade following the use of an aromatase inhibitor and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women remains unclear, but fulvestrant and megestrol acetate or the use of an aromatase inactivator (exemestane) following an aromatase inhibitor are all available options with some activity. Over the next few years, clinical trials will clarify the optimal sequence of endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women. The use of estrogen and progesterone receptor status to select for endocrine therapy is undeniably crucial. HER2/neu overexpression may also predict response to endocrine therapy, but this remains controversial.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. J. Pietras Biologic Basis of Sequential and Combination Therapies for Hormone-Responsive Breast Cancer Oncologist, July 1, 2006; 11(7): 704 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R I Nicholson, C Staka, F Boyns, I R Hutcheson, and J M W Gee Growth factor-driven mechanisms associated with resistance to estrogen deprivation in breast cancer: new opportunities for therapy Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2004; 11(4): 623 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |