Clinical Cancer Research AACR Conference on Cancer Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dowsett, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dowsett, M.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 9, 502S-510s, January 2003
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research


Supplement

Preoperative Models to Evaluate Endocrine Strategies for Breast Cancer1

Mitch Dowsett2

Academic Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom

There are essentially two approaches to presurgical therapy. The first strategy is one in which the therapy is given to downstage the disease over a period of some 3–4 months. In these circumstances, biological studies can be conducted that can be associated with clinical response. The second strategy involves the institution of medical therapy before surgery with no delay to that surgery. This is essentially incidental and is not given with the aim of having a therapeutic benefit but rather for the biological study of the particular therapeutic approach. In the incidental therapy scenario, we have conducted a number of studies to evaluate the biological effects of raloxifene, idoxifene, fulvestrant (in comparison with tamoxifen), and the aromatase inhibitor 4-hydroxyandrostenedione. Significant reductions in proliferation were noted in all, as was down-regulation of estrogen receptor levels. The changes were most profound in those estrogen receptor-positive tumors that were also progesterone receptor positive, consistent with the greater clinical effect of these therapies in this population. This setting is particularly valuable for treatments in which there is no particular evidence for clinical benefit but in which the therapy is known to be safe. It is possible to evaluate potential resistance mechanisms by associating changes in Ki67 or apoptosis with the expression of the putative determinant of resistance in the short-term presurgical model.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
W. Demark-Wahnefried, S. L George, B. R Switzer, D. C Snyder, J. F Madden, T. J Polascik, M. T Ruffin IV, and R. T Vollmer
Overcoming challenges in designing and implementing a phase II randomized controlled trial using a presurgical model to test a dietary intervention in prostate cancer
Clinical Trials, June 1, 2008; 5(3): 262 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. J. Ellis
Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy as a Drug Development Strategy
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2004; 10(1): 391S - 395S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Cancer Research.