
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Session II: ISOTOPIC CONJUGATES, PRECLINICAL AND PRETARGETING |
IBC Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Morris Plains, New Jersey 07950 [E. A. R., L. Z., D. M. G., C-H. C.]; Immunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, New Jersey 07950 [W. M., H. J. H., D. M. G., C-H. C.]; and Garden State Cancer Center, Center for Molecular Medicine and Immunology, Belleville, New Jersey 07109 [R. M. S., H. K., D. M. G.]
Purpose: Two bispecific diabodies (BS1.5 and BS1.5H) and two bispecific trivalent proteins (BS6 and BS8) were produced and tested as potential agents for pretargeted delivery of radiolabeled bivalent haptens to tumors expressing carcinoembryonic antigen.
Experimental Design: Each of the four proteins was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified from the soluble fraction. BS1.5 and BS1.5H (a humanized version of BS1.5) were evaluated in the GW-39 human colonic tumor-nude mouse model using a di-HSG-1,4,7,10-tetra-azacyclododecane-N,N',N'' N'''-tetraacetic acid peptide (IMP-241) radiolabeled with 111In. The biodistribution and T/NT ratios were compared with those of hMN-14 x m679 (Fab' x Fab') prepared chemically.
Results: In animals, both BS1.5 and BS1.5H cleared more rapidly than hMN-14 x m679 and showed tumor to nontumor ratios far superior to those of hMN-14 x m679. For example, with BS1.5 injected 8 h before 111In-IMP-241, the tumor uptake of 111In was 10.3 ± 2.7 and 6.3 ± 2.2% ID/g at 3 and 24 h, respectively, with the tumor to blood ratios being 167 ± 35 at 3 h and 631 ± 231 at 24 h. In comparison, the tumor to blood ratios of 111In observed for hMN-14 x m679 given 24 h earlier were 8 ± 2 at 3 h and 16 ± 3 at 24 h.
Conclusions: These results indicate that BS1.5 and BS1.5H are promising candidates for use in a variety of pretargeting applications, including tumor therapy with radionuclides and drugs. BS6 and BS8 may be even more attractive because of their potential to achieve higher levels of tumor uptake because of divalent carcinoembryonic antigen binding.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. M. Sharkey, H. Karacay, C. R. Johnson, S. Litwin, E. A. Rossi, W. J. McBride, C.-H. Chang, and D. M. Goldenberg Pretargeted Versus Directly Targeted Radioimmunotherapy Combined with Anti-CD20 Antibody Consolidation Therapy of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2009; 50(3): 444 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. McBride, P. Zanzonico, R. M. Sharkey, C. Noren, H. Karacay, E. A. Rossi, M. J. Losman, P.-Y. Brard, C.-H. Chang, S. M. Larson, et al. Bispecific Antibody Pretargeting PET (ImmunoPET) with an 124I-Labeled Hapten-Peptide J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 1678 - 1688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. G. van Schaijk, E. Oosterwijk, A. C. Soede, M. Broekema, C. Frielink, W. J. McBride, D. M. Goldenberg, F. H.M. Corstens, and O. C. Boerman Pretargeting of Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Expressing Tumors with a Biologically Produced Bispecific Anticarcinoembryonic Antigen x Anti-Indium-Labeled Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic Acid Antibody Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 7130s - 7136s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Sharkey and D. M. Goldenberg Perspectives on Cancer Therapy with Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibodies J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1_suppl): 115S - 127S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |