
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Hermelin Brain Tumor Center [D. M., M. L. R., I. F. N., O. B., S. A. R.], Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology [M. J.], and Department of Neuropathology [J. A. G.], Henry Ford Health Sciences Center, Detroit, Michigan 48202
Purpose: In a study of 208 meningiomas, we found a high incidence of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 10 in benign (73.4%), atypical (80.0%), and malignant (86.7%) tumors. A large percentage of the benign and atypical tumors and an increasing percentage of malignant tumors had LOH on multiple loci (43.9%, 45%, and 66.7%, respectively). The high incidence of LOH occurring early in meningioma progression suggests that LOH at individual alleles may serve as a marker of clinically relevant alterations useful for patient diagnosis, the subclassification of tumors, and/or the treatment of patients.
Experimental Design: To test this, we examined 208 sporadic and recurrent meningiomas of all grades for correlations between LOH at 11 markers on chromosome 10 and tumor location, histology, and grade and patient race, gender, age, recurrence, and survival.
Results: Several significant correlations were found. The data indicate that genetic differences occur not only between tumors of different grade, but also between tumors of the same grade, and therefore may be useful to define genetic subsets with clinical implications. LOH at D10S179 (P = 0.001) or D10S169 (P = 0.004) is most likely present in higher-grade meningiomas and, when present in benign tumors, may signify sampling error or a morphologically benign but biologically aggressive tumor. Furthermore, LOH at D10S209 (P = 0.06) and D10S169 (P = 0.01) may predict shorter survival and/or higher rates of recurrence, respectively, in tumors with benign or malignant histology.
Conclusions: We conclude that these chromosome 10 markers deserve further testing as unfavorable prognostic indicators for meningioma patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Okamoto, J. Li, A. O. Vortmeyer, H. Jaffe, Y.-S. Lee, S. Glasker, T.-S. Sohn, W. Zeng, B. Ikejiri, M. A. Proescholdt, et al. Comparative proteomic profiles of meningioma subtypes. Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 66(20): 10199 - 10204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Espinosa, M. D. Tabernero, A. Maillo, J. M. Sayagues, J. Ciudad, M. Merino, M. C. Alguero, A. M. Lubombo, P. Sousa, A. Santos-Briz, et al. The Cytogenetic Relationship between Primary and Recurrent Meningiomas Points to the Need for New Treatment Strategies in Cases at High Risk of Relapse Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 12(3): 772 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |