Clinical Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braybrooke, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Talbot, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Braybrooke, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Talbot, D. C.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 9, 4682-4688, October 15, 2003
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Trials

Pharmacokinetic Study of Cisplatin and Infusional Etoposide Phosphate in Advanced Breast Cancer with Correlation of Response to Topoisomerase II{alpha} Expression

Jeremy P. Braybrooke, Nicola C. Levitt, Simon Joel, Theresa Davis, Srinivasan Madhusudan, Helen Turley, Sue Wilner, Adrian L. Harris and Denis C. Talbot1

Cancer Research UK Medical Oncology Unit, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LJ [J. P. B., N. C. L., S. M., R. D., H. T., S. W., A. L. H., D. C. T.], and Department of Medical Oncology, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London EC1A 7BE [S. J.], United Kingdom

ABSTRACT

Purpose: There is substantial interpatient variability in etoposide pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic adjustment to specific plasma concentrations may make it possible to define a therapeutic plasma concentration and relate drug target expression in the tumor to response. This study evaluated the combination of cisplatin with a prolonged infusion of etoposide phosphate (EP) in advanced breast cancer and correlated response to topoisomerase II expression.

Experimental Design: Eligible patients, previously treated with an anthracycline, received 60 mg/m2 cisplatin, followed by a 5-day infusion of EP. Plasma etoposide levels were measured on days 2 and 4 of each cycle with adjustment of the infusion rate to achieve an initial target etoposide concentration of 2 µg/ml or 1.5 µg/ml. Primary tumor blocks were stained by immunohistochemistry for topoisomerase II{alpha} and ß.

Results: Thirty-six patients, treated in three consecutive cohorts, received 145 cycles of chemotherapy. Targeting plasma etoposide concentration reduced interpatient pharmacokinetic variability (32% and 62% of patients, respectively, within 10% of target concentration on days 2 and 4; cycle 1). Significant hematological toxicity (89% of patients with at least one episode of grade III/IV neutropenia, 64% of patients with at least one episode of grade III/IV thrombocytopenia) was observed. Thirty-nine percent of patients achieved a partial response, and 19% had stable disease for at least 3 months. The median time to tumor progression was 4 months, with a median survival of 11 months. Topoisomerase II{alpha} expression was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in responding patients compared with those with stable or progressive disease. There was no difference in topoisomerase IIß expression between groups.

Conclusion: Cisplatin and infusional EP is an active, but intensive, schedule in heavily pretreated patients with breast cancer. Clinical response correlates with tumor topoisomerase II{alpha} expression.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
L. P. Mueller, J. Luetzkendorf, T. Mueller, K. Reichelt, H. Simon, and H.-J. Schmoll
Presence of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Human Bone Marrow After Exposure to Chemotherapy: Evidence of Resistance to Apoptosis Induction
Stem Cells, December 1, 2006; 24(12): 2753 - 2765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
K.-U. Kim, S. M. Wilson, K. S. Abayasiriwardana, R. Collins, L. Fjellbirkeland, Z. Xu, D. M. Jablons, S. L. Nishimura, and V. C. Broaddus
A Novel In Vitro Model of Human Mesothelioma for Studying Tumor Biology and Apoptotic Resistance
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., December 1, 2005; 33(6): 541 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. D. Mayo, Y. R. Seo, M. W. Jackson, M. L. Smith, J. R. Guzman, C. K. Korgaonkar, and D. B. Donner
Phosphorylation of Human p53 at Serine 46 Determines Promoter Selection and whether Apoptosis Is Attenuated or Amplified
J. Biol. Chem., July 15, 2005; 280(28): 25953 - 25959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Cancer Research.